2007 Radix MP122 for the 2007 6.0Maxx W/L92 Heads
#11
yup, I was a bit confused because I thought he had the best deals on magie blowers... I try to stay away from the forced induction section because Im not quite ready to get a radix but you never know I might just get compulsive and call the first sponsor I find
sorry Brian kinda
sorry Brian kinda
#12
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
yup, I was a bit confused because I thought he had the best deals on magie blowers... I try to stay away from the forced induction section because Im not quite ready to get a radix but you never know I might just get compulsive and call the first sponsor I find
sorry Brian kinda 
sorry Brian kinda 
#13
Sorry for another question but why wasn't the mp112 used?. I know the mp112 was near its efficiency limit with the lq4/lq9, but isn't it best to have the smallest blower you can so it makes boost sooner? Did you find that with the l76 , the mp112 was just not flowing enough or out of its efficiency range? I am just curious because isn't the mp122 on the big side for stock radix boost levels since I've seen it feed higher boost 6.0's or 402/408's? Or was the purpose to give the kits some growth room since its a popular trend to up the boost over stock lvls. Just curious thats all
#14
Sorry for another question but why wasn't the mp112 used?. I know the mp112 was near its efficiency limit with the lq4/lq9, but isn't it best to have the smallest blower you can so it makes boost sooner? Did you find that with the l76 , the mp112 was just not flowing enough or out of its efficiency range? I am just curious because isn't the mp122 on the big side for stock radix boost levels since I've seen it feed higher boost 6.0's or 402/408's? Or was the purpose to give the kits some growth room since its a popular trend to up the boost over stock lvls. Just curious thats all
#15
so this is due to the massive intake port size on the L92 flowing a lot more air before the restriction rises (boost pressure) vs the lq4/lq9 heads (317 right?).
So would this mean that you can add a lot more air flow before you get to 7psi(restriction) with the l92 heads vs the 317's?
So would this mean that you can add a lot more air flow before you get to 7psi(restriction) with the l92 heads vs the 317's?
#16
so this is due to the massive intake port size on the L92 flowing a lot more air before the restriction rises (boost pressure) vs the lq4/lq9 heads (317 right?).
So would this mean that you can add a lot more air flow before you get to 7psi(restriction) with the l92 heads vs the 317's?
So would this mean that you can add a lot more air flow before you get to 7psi(restriction) with the l92 heads vs the 317's?
I would love to see some side by side comparisons with the 2 different style heads and the same Supercharger with nothing else changed. The L92's can also handle more timing when compared to the LS based heads.
We will be installing the L92 heads on the project 427 SSR in the next 30 days but we are making other changes to the Supercharger at the same time. This would be a great test but I wont have the time to R&R the Supercharger 2 times in 1 weekend. I will have my plate full to R&R the heads and disassemble the Supercharger for all the modification needed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GXPJAY
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
5
Feb 13, 2022 08:15 AM
Breitling
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
Jul 6, 2015 06:39 PM





