Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

1st dyno of S369sxe 4.8

Old Oct 29, 2017 | 04:44 PM
  #1  
fastjweb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 19
From: NewBern NC/Lake Havasu City AZ
Default 1st dyno of S369sxe 4.8

Well, entered a dyno comp yesterday. 20lbs of boost and made 604rwhp/750 rwtq. Seems 80-100hp low and graph is crazy weird but it was fun. Dyno dynamics. It ran 1.50 60ft, 6.61 at 104, 10.39 at 128.9 Fri night, 4250lbs.



Last edited by fastjweb; Oct 29, 2017 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2017 | 07:06 PM
  #2  
madmann26's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Default

Originally Posted by fastjweb
Well, entered a dyno comp yesterday. 20lbs of boost and made 604rwhp/750 rwtq. Seems 80-100hp low and graph is crazy weird but it was fun. Dyno dynamics. It ran 1.50 60ft, 6.61 at 104, 10.39 at 128.9 Fri night, 4250lbs.


Calculator has you at 748.11hp for 10.39 1/4 and 4250 race weight.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2017 | 07:29 PM
  #3  
black00chev's Avatar
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Default

Yeah its weird that both HP and TQ go up in the same increments on the graph but the lines dont cross at 5250 like normal.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2017 | 07:45 PM
  #4  
fastjweb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 19
From: NewBern NC/Lake Havasu City AZ
Default

Yeah guys, I knew it was wrong, but also nice to get feed back. Thank you. I questioned the graph, and didn't really get a good answer. I did get my 50 dollar entry fee back for making over 500 rwhp, and got prize for highest assisted hp, and prize for driving the farthest to get there. Would have been nice to have a accurate read out though.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2017 | 06:37 AM
  #5  
black00chev's Avatar
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Default

To me it seems like maybe the dyno wasn't a load bearing dyno. But still good to know you're making atleast that much!
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2017 | 07:55 AM
  #6  
fastjweb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 19
From: NewBern NC/Lake Havasu City AZ
Default

It was loaded. Sounded like too much load if that does anything
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2017 | 10:40 AM
  #7  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

They're strong numbers, even if they arent accurate!

Looks like you had fun!
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 04:52 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 106
From: FL
Default

What's the average observed drivetrain loss for one of these trucks? I was thinking 18% or so with the 4L80E.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 08:01 PM
  #9  
fastjweb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 19
From: NewBern NC/Lake Havasu City AZ
Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
What's the average observed drivetrain loss for one of these trucks? I was thinking 18% or so with the 4L80E.
I thought around 22%, but I could be wrong
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 08:41 AM
  #10  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Dyno calculated engine RPM didn't match actual engine RPM. That's why it appears to have peaked like 1000rpm low... Pretty typical operator oversight.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.