1st dyno of S369sxe 4.8
#11
Vertical axes don't line up.
If the torque is right, then the HP is low by 75 or so.....
Beautiful torque curve, truck must be REALLY fun to drive.
. At only 4250 pounds, I'd bet traction management is the hardest part of running that on the street. What size tire you have out back ?
If the torque is right, then the HP is low by 75 or so.....
Beautiful torque curve, truck must be REALLY fun to drive.
. At only 4250 pounds, I'd bet traction management is the hardest part of running that on the street. What size tire you have out back ?
#12
Vertical axes don't line up.
If the torque is right, then the HP is low by 75 or so.....
Beautiful torque curve, truck must be REALLY fun to drive.
. At only 4250 pounds, I'd bet traction management is the hardest part of running that on the street. What size tire you have out back ?
If the torque is right, then the HP is low by 75 or so.....
Beautiful torque curve, truck must be REALLY fun to drive.
. At only 4250 pounds, I'd bet traction management is the hardest part of running that on the street. What size tire you have out back ?
#13
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
If you go by NHRA factorung... 10.39 / 5.825 = 1.7837, 1.7837 X 1.7837 X 1.7837 = 5.675, 4250 kbs / 5.675 = roughly 750 flywheel HP. This works only if all the planets are aligned... efficient converter, dead hooks, etc.
22% drivetrain loss would be about 585 RWHP... not sure if this can accurately be applied to turbo vehicles .
22% drivetrain loss would be about 585 RWHP... not sure if this can accurately be applied to turbo vehicles .