Drag Racing Fastest Truck List inside, sortable for any make/model/engine listed.
TIME SLIP DATABASE

Highest MPH on the 1/4 mi with N/A 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2006 | 12:48 AM
  #1  
La Charcoal's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: La Joya, Tx.
Default Highest MPH on the 1/4 mi with N/A 6.0

This is just to ask anybody out there if it is possible to hit 12.4 on the 1/4 mi @ 112 mph on just a cammed motor. We had a big race and people are saying that he used a sneaky pete. What do u all think?
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 12:55 AM
  #2  
TouchOfEvil04's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Walker
Default

Doesn't sound right to me.Just cam nothin else?What bolt ons did he have with it?Was it tuned?Stall?
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 01:03 AM
  #3  
La Charcoal's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: La Joya, Tx.
Default

Well they said it has all the bolt ons and a 6.0 w cam. sorry for the miss info.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 01:04 AM
  #4  
La Charcoal's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: La Joya, Tx.
Default

It's just we have never seen these times on a cammed motor only.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 01:06 AM
  #5  
La Charcoal's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: La Joya, Tx.
Default

Last week his times were 12.7 @ 106 and it was kinda constant with the other times and this week there was a big change. The sneaky pete nos setup says it gives about 2-3 secs and 2-3 mph
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 03:26 AM
  #6  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Take a look to see if he's running a truck intake or not. I don't see how he'd be able to pull that kind of mph running the stock truck intake.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 08:08 AM
  #7  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

the e/t could be possible but the only sneaky stuff would the mph??

another thing could be that the mph were bad readings on that night??
it has happened to me not too long ago here at HRP... and I found out cause everybody on LS1tech was talking about it....

Last edited by ap2002; May 14, 2006 at 08:22 AM.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #8  
La Riddler's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Mission, Tx.
Default

I don't think the readings were wrong cause Rgvsierra was the contender and he did get his time right.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #9  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

More details on the passes.

On the 12.7 @ 106, how was the weather, how did he 60'?

On the 12.4 @ 112, how was the weather, and how did he 60'?

Is this Danny (RGVSierra) we are talking about?
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 09:23 AM
  #10  
La Riddler's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Mission, Tx.
Default

Yea it's Danny

I remember him hitting 12.7@106 in a 50 60 degree weather
Then on a 70 degree he hit 12.5@107mph
This race was on friday and the weather was sucky, everybody was a tenth or two off and he still managed a 12.4@112mph
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 PM.