Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Question about timing vs power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2011 | 11:44 PM
  #1  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default Question about timing vs power

I'm doing a little bench racing here, until I can make it back to the track.

On Saturday, I made a pass at AKRP, went 12.74 at 100 mph. There was no track prep & I spun hard in 4x4 off the line. I just looked at my datalog from that run and I see why. From just after shifting into 2nd gear, I only had 8 degrees of timing for the rest of the run. I already know why this happened, and it will not happen again. Unless I have a brain-fart again....

So my question is, how much power do you guys think I gave up with the low timing? I normally run between 16-18 degrees of timing at the track, mostly depending on the quality of 90 octane I obtained at the pump. How much faster/quicker do you think it would've gone?

I'd like to hear some opinions on this, then I'll put them to the test in one of these upcoming weekends. I'll post up the results.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 11:48 PM
  #2  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Hopefully a lot faster because my truck traps 100ish lol.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 11:51 PM
  #3  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

It was a botched run. It traps higher than that.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 11:56 PM
  #4  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

So you were down, 8 + deg the whole run. I would say you missed out on a a solid 30+ hp.. Maybe i am way off, some setups are more sensitive to timing then others, but being Fi, I think that is a fair statement..
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #5  
rel3rd's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 4
From: Baltimore, MD.
Default

Like John said, some setups are more sensitive than others, and some are a LOT more sensitive than others...

Case in point, my old blown 86 Mustang ran best of 10.24@133 with regular runs in high 10.20's/low 10.30's @ 132 all day long...This was on Torco 118NOS fuel and 28 degrees of total timing.

Just for the heck of it, I ran it exactly as I drove it on the street, which was with 18 degrees total timing and pump 93 octane. Results were damn near exactly 1 second and 10 mph slower...11.25@122 and rather consistent.

This was a 502rwhp/543rwtq (on 118 octane) 3470# car.

10 degrees = 100hp in my car but your results may vary.
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:32 PM
  #6  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Just like dropping 100 pounds off your vehicle is not exactly proportional to dropping 0.1 seconds off an ET, timing is not directly related to horsepower. Adding 8-10° is worth at LEAST 30rwhp on your setup.
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:37 PM
  #7  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

I bet it's alot more than 30hp. The truck just layed down when it pulled the 8 degrees. I'll have it on a dyno on June 4th. Maybe I'll dyno it, then pull 8 degrees and dyno it again. That could be interesting, right?
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #8  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Definitely interesting lol. Adding 5° on my 5.3 was easily worth 30, it was very noticeable SOTP. You'll likely net a lot more, like you said. What was the DA at the track when you ran the 12.7?
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #9  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

That why I said 30+, alot plays a roll like SS said...
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #10  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,520
Likes: 244
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Not that it applies to a modified engine, or is accurate even with a stock engine, but this table shows that 8° retard reduces torque about 2%. That can't be accurate. 2% of 350 is 7.

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.