Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

iat's shoot up/truck leans out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 08:30 PM
  #11  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Sounds like it just needs to be tuned then...

Best way to find a leak is to crawl under there with the engine running and feel for air coming out of every joint, especially around where the crossover connects to the manifolds and around the wastegate. Even a very small leak will throw off trims and affect turbo behavior.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 09:07 PM
  #12  
MechE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

do you mind taking a screenshot of a good, tuned bias table to give me a starting point? with a stock bias table, when the engine would get about 200*, the afr's would lean out, and i never could tune it right so they wouldnt lean out when the engine got warm
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 09:13 PM
  #13  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Pretty sure mine is stock, and pretty sure that table has very little effect on anything.

Post up your hpt file and ill take a look.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 09:20 PM
  #14  
MechE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

alright..
Attached Files
File Type: hpt
13 psi.hpt (522.8 KB, 87 views)
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 09:42 PM
  #15  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

It looks fine to me really...I would put the O2s back in and try closed loop. Closed loop means the STFTs correct fueling.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 09:44 PM
  #16  
MechE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

well thats what ill do, i appreciate it
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 11:42 AM
  #17  
Ferocity02's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 2
Default

It's difficult to adjust the tune to account for every possible scenario of operating condition (IAT, ETC, MAP, TPS, etc...). So you do the best you can getting it 90% of the way there, then enable closed loop so the NBO2's can get the last 10%. At least that's my interpretation. If you go for 100% without the NBO2's you'll be chasing your tail for a long time.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 01:03 PM
  #18  
Gadgetized's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY
Default

I had this problem also. The problem is the IAT placement. The IAT is getting heat soaked from the engine compartment, and the radiator. There are 2 temps to be concerned with, first is the engine temp, and the other is the IAT temp. There is a blend ratio that is dependant on air speed. Basically what happens is ambient air enters the intake system, and gradually gets heated up while on its way to the engine. The slower engine speeds mean that the air has a longer chance to get heated up, therefore faster air has a lesser chance of getting heated up. At lower air flow the table is favored towards engine coolant temperature, and at higher speed it is favored towards IAT. The IAT needs to be at outside air temp or as cool as it can be in the intake system. In a naturally aspirated car it should be to the side of the radiator, and as close to the filter as possible. In a turbo engine like mine it should be right after the intercooler. What happens if you don't do this is the IAT reads hotter than it actually is, and believes that the air entering the cylinder is also hotter. When air heats up it expands therefore letting less air entering the cylinder(or at least the PCM believes this) and therefore cuts fuel to make up for a hotter air charge. The problem is more noticable at lower RPM's than higher RPM's as the blend is more favored to the coolant temp.

Does that make sense?

Last edited by Gadgetized; Apr 2, 2014 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 03:07 PM
  #19  
MechE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

yes, i understand the physics behind it quite well. i spent about a month trying to tune the bias table to no avail though, my iat is right before the tb. i know its getting heat soaked in stop and go traffic, i thought about relocating it to behind the passenger headlight, but i spray meth, so i don't want to lose any valuable information about the actual temperature. i can get the afr's within 8-9% of what they should be in open loop at low air flows. but atmospheric conditions change from hour to hour, so i can never nail it down, thats why im just gonna go closed loop and let the computer do it
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blwn99x
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
4
Mar 24, 2023 11:14 AM
Pimpinpete
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
43
Dec 22, 2017 08:13 AM
AdaMax
FORCED INDUCTION
19
May 16, 2016 11:35 PM
JordanH
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Oct 3, 2015 03:59 PM
02AWDAWSDenali
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
Oct 1, 2015 05:08 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.