Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Anybody ever checked out a WAIT4ME tune?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #21  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

i got it pulled up right now and has 22 degrees wot timing..thats not much..
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #22  
dc_justin's Avatar
Hello Dave
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by dirt_track_racer_81
i got it pulled up right now and has 22 degrees wot timing..thats not much..
Check the Fuel Mixture correction table. All of them that I've seen have been around 28*
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

Mine was 22* when WOT also.
AFR table Zeroed out.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #24  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by dc_justin
Check the Fuel Mixture correction table. All of them that I've seen have been around 28*
its set to zero
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #25  
dc_justin's Avatar
Hello Dave
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Moddoo
Mine was 22* when WOT also.
AFR table Zeroed out.
Looking at your cam, that's why, you're pulling more air than your basic bolt-on trucks. The ones I've retuned or examined haven't been as modified as yours.

Lookin at a 2003 5.3L tahoe tune of his. 22* from 0.76g/cyl+. Tahoe only pulled 0.60g/cyl air peak and has 28* in the high octane table at that point.

2003 5.3L Silverado. 24* from 0.76g/cyl+. That truck pulled in 0.64g/cyl at peak and has 27* defined there.

2002 5.3L Silverado. 22* from 0.76g/cyl+. Don't have a log of this one, but same profile as the other tunes.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #26  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

You make a good point DC.
My truck is pulling .84g/cyl in the upper rpm range.
I don't have the scans from when it was stock, but was told 22* was all I was getting then also.
BTW,
I'm not bashing Jesse's tunes.
I think they are great for the guy who just wants his stocker to be a little faster for a little $.
I have no experience with getting a custom tune for mods from him.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #27  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

Would it be rude of me if I post a pic of the Hi octane table that I recieved?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #28  
gtosilverado's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
Default

no, go ahead an post it
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #29  
dc_justin's Avatar
Hello Dave
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Moddoo
Would it be rude of me if I post a pic of the Hi octane table that I recieved?
I don't think it would be rude, per se, but considering the fact that these tunes are his source of income that individuals purchase, it probably wouldn't be fair to just post up one of his tables without permission. That's just my opinion though.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #30  
Nick™'s Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Red Stick, La
Default

don't post the table, it's not right to share that type of info - no matter how good or bad it may be.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.