yea to me they got a weak schedule. i think they should start some kind of playoffs that way you get in for winning not by someone voting for you. i remember the other week miami was ahead of alabama and alabama was undefeated and miami had a loss.

 

ya.. they have been talking about playoff scenarios for years... its just that these bowl games bring in so much money. If they made a big enough deal out of the playoffs i think it would bring in even more money... recently tho i beleive the talking about playoffs has become more serious since last seasons delemia with auburn being 3rd and it wasnt clear if they should have been 2nd or not. And than this year it has been unclear if USC's schedule was challenging enough.. i think USC should have dropped in the rankings when they barely beat Notre Dame... idk i would like to see a playoff of the top 4 teams. 1vs4 2vs3 and than the winners of each for the Championship.

 

i personally think it should be bigger than that like the top 16 teams would make the playoffs. notre dame should have won that game they got ripped. im sure theres teams that are plenty good to do well if they were given a chance to play a good team

 

How did UGA throw it away.. AU had time of possession 33:30 to UGAs 26:30, Passing AU was 279(9.3 Average), Uga did have 304 passing but 8.0 average..Auburns rushing was 227 compared to UGAs 142...

Basically Auburn almost threw it away, and as someone else mentioned, shockley would have been WEAK w/out Pope, he almost threw 4 interceptions, he can scramble though.

 

Hell yeah thats what Im talkin about.

USC always gets their spot at the top for playing **** teams so they llok good cant wait for UT to kick their ***.

Also cant wait for this voting system **** to go away