THE TRUCK STOP General Chat area. Religion and politics topics will undoubtedly be deleted. Anything over PG-13 is not allowed. WORK SAFE!

Seriously?? driver completley sucked baddd..

Old Jul 17, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
nonnieselman's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default Seriously?? driver completley sucked baddd..


12.8@111? haha thats an embarrassement!
11.6@124 aint completly bad but still thought those cares were Fast.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 07:23 PM
  #2  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

dam that shelby is moving out. Throw some slicks and a hard launch would be sick..
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #3  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

Could ford make the blower housing and engine bay any uglier? The "SVT" looks terrible on there.

That ZL1 needed a better driver and slicks. But that mud stain does run good.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 07:55 PM
  #4  
DR132's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 388
Likes: 4
From: ALASKA
Default

camaro really needed a driver who could launch...
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 08:20 PM
  #5  
ak2007r6's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Default

Interesting. Both cars could have used a better driver but looks like they had fun.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
62nalide's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2
From: Dallas TX
Default

I just hope GM puts them Camaros on a diet for the 6th gen so i can jump on one if not Ill have to drive a FURD car and a GM truck lol
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

I have rode it both the Camaro SS and the new 5.0's, as much as I hate to say it..... The new 5.0 runs better. With that being said, yes the Camaro needed a better driver but 112mph vs. 122mph = Mustang win regardless.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 03:30 AM
  #8  
DR132's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 388
Likes: 4
From: ALASKA
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
I have rode it both the Camaro SS and the new 5.0's, as much as I hate to say it..... The new 5.0 runs better. With that being said, yes the Camaro needed a better driver but 112mph vs. 122mph = Mustang win regardless.
no doubt but it should've been closer. those new mustangs are impressive.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 12:33 PM
  #9  
1994Vmax's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 104
Default

Driver suck regardless look at the trap speed of the Camaro..... Unless the guy wasn't even on the throttle, 111 mph??? I used to do that with my mildly modded SRT8 Charger. Pretty sad for a 580hp/550 lb ft LSA......
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 01:07 PM
  #10  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Horrible drivers for sure. Given the Ford driver was better. Hmm Based on what they cost, i will take my truck
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.