System update!!!
#11
AQ is a wicked bang for the buck. everyone knows the connection between them and DD. but the AQ is quite up to par with DD. i don't have experience with the mach 5, but you surely won't go wrong with the other 3.
my vote would be for the DD or AQ. if you get one of those, hit me up and i'll give you a few pointers for a box that they like. i've got one guy who broke his old CA state record for the USAC 601 - 1800 stock class using only 2 DD 9512's! and his still get's it on with any type of music.
my vote would be for the DD or AQ. if you get one of those, hit me up and i'll give you a few pointers for a box that they like. i've got one guy who broke his old CA state record for the USAC 601 - 1800 stock class using only 2 DD 9512's! and his still get's it on with any type of music.
#12
AQ is a wicked bang for the buck. everyone knows the connection between them and DD. but the AQ is quite up to par with DD. i don't have experience with the mach 5, but you surely won't go wrong with the other 3.
my vote would be for the DD or AQ. if you get one of those, hit me up and i'll give you a few pointers for a box that they like. i've got one guy who broke his old CA state record for the USAC 601 - 1800 stock class using only 2 DD 9512's! and his still get's it on with any type of music.
my vote would be for the DD or AQ. if you get one of those, hit me up and i'll give you a few pointers for a box that they like. i've got one guy who broke his old CA state record for the USAC 601 - 1800 stock class using only 2 DD 9512's! and his still get's it on with any type of music.
#14
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
I don't want to sound stupid, I am usually up to par on stereo eq, but how long has treo been out?? I don't think I have heard of them. from the latests reads I have found, they seem to bee up there with the top makers.... BTW 141 is pounding for one sub
Thanks John
Thanks John
#15
Well they have been around as long as i have been into car audio (bout 5 years, since i could drive) but i dont know exactly how long. I was very impressed with the 141 the ssi did and that is why i was looking into an ssx bc i was curious what those would do given the proper power.....all that i have heard from treo has been good stuff, i hear their amps are suppose to be really good too but are rather expensive and hard to come by nowdays....
#16
I don't want to sound stupid, I am usually up to par on stereo eq, but how long has treo been out?? I don't think I have heard of them. from the latests reads I have found, they seem to bee up there with the top makers.... BTW 141 is pounding for one sub
Thanks John
Thanks John
#18
imo the cxt was a let down. it spent 4 or 5 years as a prototype. every year it was going to be released and it was going to be the baddest sub on the planet. they never could accomplish that, hence why they finally just put it on the market as it was.
i'm not saying it can transform impressive acoustic energy, it just never could live up the hype of their marketing campaign.
i'm not saying it can transform impressive acoustic energy, it just never could live up the hype of their marketing campaign.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlowmasterMufflers
Ford Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
Nov 24, 2015 01:00 PM
shootermwc
GM Parts Classifieds
2
Oct 8, 2015 01:45 PM





