Did any of you guys read this months chp about the 2wd ss???? AWD...14.99....2WD.....15.1 +!! I don't want to give up to info. I wasn't impressed with the results. The 2wd weighs 480lbs less..Thats all I want to say about this.. I don't want to spoil it for those of you who hadn't read it yet.

 

I'm sure traction off the line is an issue with the 2WD.

 

My 2005 2WD SS ran a 14.86 bone stock.

 

Well, the AWD pulled all the way till 100mph. I don't know...this is what CHP printed!!! I just thought that ya'll would find it interesting!

 

ya, idk, sounds like some unskilled drivers to me. Either that or some serious traction issues.. maybe heat was a factor too.

 

That is badass, 14.86 bone stock. I know that I would like to have a 2WD but the fact that it snows like a **** here in the winter the AWD sure is nice to have.

There must have been some traction issues when they were testing, I would think that the 2WD version is definitely faster.

 

What are the 60 foot times on the 2wd SS?

 

Mine were 2.15 with some DR

 

they also printed it had a 4L85E. the whole article was a bunch of BS.

 

Those magazines dont know to drive!