Destroyed a new 350Z
#11
Originally Posted by chuckie311
i had a 350z before i bought my 6.0l and if you only running 14.4-14.5 you cant drive worth a crap.. i ran a 14.1 bone stock at california speeedway 2200 ft....saying you destroyed a 350z is alittle much....cause i know i would have destroyed your truck.. funny how people talk so much crap about how they destroy all these faast cars. how do you know they were racing..want to find out how your truck really does agaist a 350z go to the track and race one..
350Z=Fast compared to a truck w/ minor mods
350Z=Slow compared to any other "fast cars"
A "fast car" really depends on what you are around...
#12
Originally Posted by 99Silverado5.3
350Z=Fast compared to a truck w/ minor mods
350Z=Slow compared to any other "fast cars"
A "fast car" really depends on what you are around...
#14
Originally Posted by CHEVRACER83
sorry bro but stock 14.1 is fast....
any whoever said the stock 350z is nothing acceleration wise has never driven one.... they run like a raped ape.
any whoever said the stock 350z is nothing acceleration wise has never driven one.... they run like a raped ape.

#15
I love how people like to go out spend $30k and think their car is fast as ****. Yeah 350z's are quick for what they are.But i like the fact i could go out buy a used stock 5.0 stang and keep up with the $30k sports cars for 1/10th the price.
#16
Well since the dude who posted this hasn't been around to defend his position, I'll chime in here since I drive a truck set up very similar to his. I've raced SEVERAL 350Zs and G35s on the street and I have never been beaten by one. I've had some good runs with a few but have never seen one get away from me so I think his story sounds entirely feasible. Honestly I think those cars might be a little overrated because something that small pushing 300 horse should be good for 13s but that's just my opinion.



except i wouldnt take the time to
on a mustang, id buy a camaro!
