Project: No Experience
#14
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,241
Likes: 7
at Avatar....What size LSX are you considering building? Even though those turbos are rated at 1000hp each, on what size engine? If you have too many cubes they can likely choke before they make that power. And what A/R?
The 1200hp Hot Rod 4.8 turbos were the opposite.....small turbines and 76mm (I think) compressors.
Last edited by 1CAMWNDR; Jun 6, 2016 at 10:02 AM.
#18
Thread Starter
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
at Avatar....What size LSX are you considering building? Even though those turbos are rated at 1000hp each, on what size engine? If you have too many cubes they can likely choke before they make that power. And what A/R?
The 1200hp Hot Rod 4.8 turbos were the opposite.....small turbines and 76mm (I think) compressors.
But experience is George's favorite word...it just felt right.
#19
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,241
Likes: 7

LSX376-B15. If the turbos can flow the air, I will build the engine to accommodate it. I've finally got a standalone matlab license again, so I've been working on a model for engine airflow estimation to back-calculate a camshaft profile to optimize for the turbos capabilities. Believe I saw an Evo make like 868whp with the 9180, so I should be able to double that. The truck has more drivetrain loss, but it'll likely be more efficient.
#20
Thread Starter
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
The evo was a 2.0l. The turbos don't know what size engine is feeding them. All they see is the exhaust flow. All else equal, a 2.0 at 10k rpm looks like a 4.0 at 5k looks like an 8.0 at 2.5k....etc. I may not be able to crank out as much rpm, but I really don't want/need to anyway. Max recommended rpm for that engine is 6600 which is still plenty.






