My LQ9 Build
#61
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 991
Likes: 4
From: West Jordan, UT
Keeping it streetable/haulable. Mild converter. Still debating on gears. I think I may go with a 4.10. Thinking a 212/218 Comp High Lift. I know it will be a small cam for the 6.0. But should have nice low end.
#62
I'd go a tad bigger because as you mentioned, cubes eat cams. IIRC, NicD posted dyno graphs of a 216/224 (like the Vinci Trucker) in a 6.0, and it had about the same powerband as a 212/218 in a 5.3, only with bigger numbers. You could match that cam with a 2600 converter and have a totally streetable, stealthy, LQ9. With good tuning, you won't even know that cam is in there. I was planning that same combo, with 3.73's, until I decided that I wanted a 220/224, 3k converter, with 4.10's, which now has grown into a 224/230, 3200ish converter, still 4.10's lol. Any one of those combos will be streetable to me, IMO, but what is considered streetable to one guy may be a PITA to another
#64
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 991
Likes: 4
From: West Jordan, UT
I'd go a tad bigger because as you mentioned, cubes eat cams. IIRC, NicD posted dyno graphs of a 216/224 (like the Vinci Trucker) in a 6.0, and it had about the same powerband as a 212/218 in a 5.3, only with bigger numbers. You could match that cam with a 2600 converter and have a totally streetable, stealthy, LQ9. With good tuning, you won't even know that cam is in there. I was planning that same combo, with 3.73's, until I decided that I wanted a 220/224, 3k converter, with 4.10's, which now has grown into a 224/230, 3200ish converter, still 4.10's lol. Any one of those combos will be streetable to me, IMO, but what is considered streetable to one guy may be a PITA to another 


Oh, and don't worry, there will be burnout vids
#67
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 991
Likes: 4
From: West Jordan, UT
#68
Dan (DV2000NJ) is running a cam with similar specs to the Vinci Trucker, just a little more lift and ground on a 114 vs. the Trucker's 115...can't remember if he's running a TT2600 or 3k though. Hit him up in a PM or check out some of his old posts and I'm sure that you'll find some good info about it. I know that he's very happy with his setup.
I spoke with Roger Vinci a while back, who talked me into this cam (which I bought, and then sold to help fund my FLT Lvl7 65E), and he was positive that I would have been happy with it in a daily driven LQ9 scenario. He runs that same cam in his DD 5.3 (RCSB I believe), with a TT2600.
I spoke with Roger Vinci a while back, who talked me into this cam (which I bought, and then sold to help fund my FLT Lvl7 65E), and he was positive that I would have been happy with it in a daily driven LQ9 scenario. He runs that same cam in his DD 5.3 (RCSB I believe), with a TT2600.
#69
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 991
Likes: 4
From: West Jordan, UT
Dan (DV2000NJ) is running a cam with similar specs to the Vinci Trucker, just a little more lift and ground on a 114 vs. the Trucker's 115...can't remember if he's running a TT2600 or 3k though. Hit him up in a PM or check out some of his old posts and I'm sure that you'll find some good info about it. I know that he's very happy with his setup.
I spoke with Roger Vinci a while back, who talked me into this cam (which I bought, and then sold to help fund my FLT Lvl7 65E), and he was positive that I would have been happy with it in a daily driven LQ9 scenario. He runs that same cam in his DD 5.3 (RCSB I believe), with a TT2600.
I spoke with Roger Vinci a while back, who talked me into this cam (which I bought, and then sold to help fund my FLT Lvl7 65E), and he was positive that I would have been happy with it in a daily driven LQ9 scenario. He runs that same cam in his DD 5.3 (RCSB I believe), with a TT2600.
Awesome. I'm going to look into this cam a little more. I'm looking at a Yank TT2600. There is one for sale on here and I want to pick it up, but I'm waiting on pay day... I think that converter will be nice.
#70
I feel that the TT2600 would be a perfect match for the Trucker in a 6.0, and Roger Vinci confirmed my assumption






