PROJECTS GALLERY Vehicle builds | Engine Swaps | Conversions | Installation write ups |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Let's see if this time I have dropping fuel pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 11:17 PM
  #21  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

All the info you should need.

DIY TRIPLE PUMPS on the quick and cheap - LS1TECH

People makeing over 1000 hp including E-85 users.

Whats the most RWHP put down by a triple 255 pump set-up - LS1TECH
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 11:20 PM
  #22  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
I havent delt with an fbody tank personally but I bet it is a better design than the truck tank. When you are low on fuel and accelerate hard all the fuel goes to the back of the tank. This wouldnt be a problem if the pumps were in the back of the tank but the are about 20 inches away in the middle of the tank.
My stock tank(40 gallon) with less then a 1/4(maybe 1/8) never had an issue at the track or beating on it on the street. That included on nitrous. Wasn't running crazy times but low 13s and 100 shot and never starved of fuel at all. Might not be perfect but something in my stock tank worked well at low fuel levels in huge tank.

I am not saying that a triple pump set up in a stock tank is going to work but all I am saying is that I didn't have any issue with a stock pump.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 11:30 PM
  #23  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

This is turning into an apples and oranges comparison. Yes triple pumps flow a lot of fuel and can be used in the stock tank. Im not sure if the geometry of the fbody tank is more condusive to keeping the pumps in fuel than the truck tank, but I bet it is. Also note Mightymouse does not use a bucket assembly, he just has the pumps laying in there, but I guarantee you he runs his full of fuel, making the half tank or lower argument a mute point for him, hence why he doesnt use a surge tank.

Your setup is a 400ish hp setup. There is a big difference in fuel needs from a 400hp setup using nitrous and a 700 or 800hp setup using FI. I know from my own experience I have pushed a single 255 to over 600hp, and I also know I have starved the pumps with dual densos and about a 1/4 tank of gas.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 11:52 PM
  #24  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

I am just trying to save mikegyver a lot of hassle if possible. Maybe there is something unique about his set up(such as truck tank) but I don't see his current plans as productive. It may work but I am confident there is a much more simple, lest costly way to get more then enough fuel for his needs.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 02:06 AM
  #25  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

It's alot easier for 3 pumps to empty a stock bucket than it is for 1 pump to empty the same bucket. ****, if you think about it for a second, the 3 pumps displace that much more fuel from the start, so there's less fuel in the bucket AT ALL TIMES. Less fuel to pump out of the bucket before they have to start pumping AIR.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 02:25 AM
  #26  
SincalT/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Currently In suspense.
Default

Im gonna go on a limb here an say the surge tank has a return line back into it to control FP at the rail correct?
The engine would have to eat up close to a gallon in the surge plus what ever the stock pump puts in while fuel is being demanded under heavy engine load or WOT.I dont think hes gonna have a problem long as the plumbing/wiring is correctly configured between pumps.Btw. the stock pump will deliver a pretty healthy amount of fuel at little to no psi.Ill test one tomarrow so we can see what the number actually is.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 08:09 AM
  #27  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
It's alot easier for 3 pumps to empty a stock bucket than it is for 1 pump to empty the same bucket. ****, if you think about it for a second, the 3 pumps displace that much more fuel from the start, so there's less fuel in the bucket AT ALL TIMES. Less fuel to pump out of the bucket before they have to start pumping AIR.
I understand this. The point I was trying to get accross was that f-body guys are running 3 pumps quite a bit with out issue. It is something to atleast look into.

Possibly the truck tank is to differant, I don't know. I am just trying to pass on info that can hopefully be helpfull.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 08:54 AM
  #28  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Thanks, I appreciate the concern. In my '00 tank, the opening is less than 4", I can't put even two of these pumps in if they are side-by-side. I've been through several fuel pump configurations, the first time that I put a physically larger pump in the stock bucket, I had to butcher the bucket. That is when I learned that you can't run less than 1/3 tank with a compromised bucket. With my stock bucket, I couldn't even put in one of these Densos without low-fuel problems.

All the stuff our heros on Tech do does not apply when it comes to the fuel tank. There is more area to the rear of the pump in our trucks than a whole f-body tank. The fuel pickup in a truck is uncovered from the gas sloshing rearward a lot more than you would think. That means that your relying on the contents and the design of the bucket heavily. I have been through the experience of having to keep the tank half full if I want to push hard on the gas pedal.

I have had two inline pumps fed by the in-tank. The Bosch 044 was inadequate, that might have been my fault since I was using a stock in-tank pump. The MagnaFuel 4301 (?) fed by a Walbro 255 worked for awhile until the 255 failed.

I've had either two or three Walbros fail. The MagnaFuel only runs about a year or two before needing a rebuild, covered under warranty. My main complaint about the MagnaFuel was the noise. I had to turn the truck off at the drive-up window. People walking beside the road always looked up at me, as if they were thinking "that's a weird noise".

So thanks for the thoughts, but you've been thinking about my fuel system for two days, I've been thinking about it for three years.

But please keep the ideas coming, that's why I started this thread before I have anything in concrete (stainless steel, )
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 09:14 AM
  #29  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by SincalT/A
Im gonna go on a limb here an say the surge tank has a return line back into it to control FP at the rail correct?
Yep. It needs seven fittings: Supply and return from the main tank, supply and return from the engine, a drain, a wiring fitting, and a vent. The vent will be a 3/4" check valve with a valve cover breather for a filter.
Originally Posted by SincalT/A
Btw. the stock pump will deliver a pretty healthy amount of fuel at little to no psi.Ill test one tomarrow so we can see what the number actually is.
Cool. That information will be valuable to everybody.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wrb002
PROJECTS GALLERY
18
Aug 31, 2015 12:00 PM
chevyl33
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
6
Aug 24, 2015 08:21 AM
GMCtrk
FORCED INDUCTION
67
Jul 17, 2015 06:39 PM
Mossyoakglock
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
0
Jul 17, 2015 08:30 AM
slowlsx
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Jul 13, 2015 04:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.