Black Truck 2014 build...ladder bars, turbo, fuel system etc etc
#111
Yeah I'm not confused now , it's gonna be closer to a track only build but still see street play , that's cool .
There's no rules to going fast
Actually it's neat to see a different truck build that is closer to a full drag setup as most of us aren't going to that end of the spectrum . Obviously there are some like Blown06 ( that's all I can remember at this time ).
There's no rules to going fast

Actually it's neat to see a different truck build that is closer to a full drag setup as most of us aren't going to that end of the spectrum . Obviously there are some like Blown06 ( that's all I can remember at this time ).
Last edited by TIM Z; Apr 2, 2014 at 08:37 AM.
#112
Just wait. We're only getting started. As we progress there will be some stuff disappear that will make people lose their minds lol. It's easy to lose weight in the back, but the front end of the truck...that's where the magic will happen
#114
#115
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Ever tested what a power booster is (Vacuum or hydrboost)?
Ill go ahead and say what im thinking, if the power booster is 5000psi then yes, I would say you are giving up a lot. If its 1200psi, then no, I agree with you.
Ill go ahead and say what im thinking, if the power booster is 5000psi then yes, I would say you are giving up a lot. If its 1200psi, then no, I agree with you.
#116
No I haven't. But what makes a 5000# vehicle with stock brakes that has the potential to accelerate to 140+ mph in a 1/4 mile safer than my lighter truck with a braking system designed to specifically slow down fast cars? I'm not doing anything that hasn't been done before
#117
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
You have a lot of variables and assumptions going on...of course real testing will be the deciding factor. The stock braking sytem was never designed for 140mph decels, in its defense. Braking power is needed according to velocity squared, ie, you need badass brakes if you go really fast.
Im not saying what you have wont work. Im just saying you might want to prioritize where you put your weight savings effort and actually test stuff in small increments instead of going ***** deep on the first run based on what has been done in other cars. Just my opinion though.
Im not saying what you have wont work. Im just saying you might want to prioritize where you put your weight savings effort and actually test stuff in small increments instead of going ***** deep on the first run based on what has been done in other cars. Just my opinion though.
#119
You have a lot of variables and assumptions going on...of course real testing will be the deciding factor. The stock braking sytem was never designed for 140mph decels, in its defense. Braking power is needed according to velocity squared, ie, you need badass brakes if you go really fast.
Im not saying what you have wont work. Im just saying you might want to prioritize where you put your weight savings effort and actually test stuff in small increments instead of going ***** deep on the first run based on what has been done in other cars. Just my opinion though.
Im not saying what you have wont work. Im just saying you might want to prioritize where you put your weight savings effort and actually test stuff in small increments instead of going ***** deep on the first run based on what has been done in other cars. Just my opinion though.
I think where you're mistaken is thinking that it's sacrificing function. That's not true. It's just sacrificing that cushy daily driver feel and I don't care about that.
#120
On my dirt track car 1000psi on manual master cylinders will lock the brakes up at 100mph and they get used alot and i ride the brakes hard. I've killed the motor trail braking several times when I've had to hit the brakes quickly..






