NITROUS OXIDE System Designs | Installation| Wet/Dry/Direct Port

14.4 to 12.4 with a 100 shot????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 02:36 PM
  #21  
ZZebes's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 1
Default

I went from a 14.5 to a 12.73 on a 150 shot
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #22  
Havok2's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (118)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: RGV texas
Default

1slow: it gets old. so thats the attitude i have with so much hating on this board towards the "la" guys..even mods get in on it..

but whatever. anyways. truck hauls *** and i think it dynod 32x or near 330 at the wheels on a mustang dyno.

Last edited by Havok2; Jan 20, 2008 at 02:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #23  
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
From: Breaux Bridge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
I think it is possible for sure, the rwhp he "should" be putting out with the mods he ahs would put him in the LOW 12s with everything being perfect given the raceweight of the truck. Full size trucks putting down 330rwhp are running mid 12s at a 4200# weight so drop a couple hundred more pounds and I think its easily doable.

Havok you come into a thread with a sour attitude expect sour comments. There is no need to be so coarse about things. Believe it or not we dont hate on every truck from the RGV, credit is given where it is due and this guy deserves it. I would love to see what one of these things would do with a 408 in it and suspension.
with every thing
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #24  
99Silverado5.3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
From: (281)-(713)-(832)
Default

I believe it 100%, truck is very light. Don't see how it's hard to believe when the guys running 5000lbs go from 14.3 to 12.6 on 150 shot.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #25  
regency's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Havok2
what can we say, RGV knows their ****.
I wouldnt go that far!!!!!!! Take a look at the place!!!!!! all these threads about really fast trucks and cars, i can believe them going that fast but i dont believe they would go that fast anywhere else. All the RGV guys on here yall are in the best place for a track to be. Keep em goin guys we all might should race over there.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #26  
regency's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria, LA
Default

ohhh yea i believe that truck went that fast light and little
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #27  
Havok2's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (118)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: RGV texas
Default

Originally Posted by regency
I wouldnt go that far!!!!!!! Take a look at the place!!!!!! all these threads about really fast trucks and cars, i can believe them going that fast but i dont believe they would go that fast anywhere else. All the RGV guys on here yall are in the best place for a track to be. Keep em goin guys we all might should race over there.
i think if these cars/trucks go up north to a better PREPPED track like htown i bet times would be a lil better.

we dont have the best track...you should run here and see
its not only about the track..it has alot to do with the setup.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #28  
regency's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria, LA
Default

well take for example these top fuel cars, they have to setup everything for the particular track they are running at. A lower sea level track is going to be faster than a higher sea level track, and one thats lower sea level is more than likely going to have a better DA than a higher sea level track. Over here in monroe or shreveport its not too seldom you see a DA under 1000' over there you very seldom see it over 1000' from some people i have talked too. When people get on here stating times i think everyone should be stating the DA as well because that makes a huge difference in times.
Whats the NORMAL DA over there???????
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #29  
regency's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria, LA
Default

but like i said, i believe that it dropped that much time because the truck is lighter and the motor is smaller and has less pistons so more N2O is going to each cylinder equaling more power
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #30  
Havok2's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (118)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: RGV texas
Default

yup. i dont credit the track much..i credit the nitrous/smaller ci, plus lightness
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.