Stock hemi vs Stock 5.3
10-06-2005, 09:42 PM
#21
TECH Resident
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baytown
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5.3AlmnBlk
i got a stock 5.3 but the problem is we have only chevy's in my 35 minute ride, if i find a ram the boys are too scared or dont know what but i leave the light at 2500rpm he stays in back of me? It's just hard up here i can count 300 chevys 3 dodges.
I KNOW you are not anywhere around Houston or you would not have that attitude.... Apples to apples... you can always find a slow 4x4 QC Hemi that runs 16's or one like mine which is consideralby faster.....
TJ
10-06-2005, 09:47 PM
#23
TECH Resident
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baytown
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The paxton kits have the limitation of little tuning as of the before mentioned lack of HemiEdit, once we have a good PCM editor I would be willing to bet those times will drop considerably.
I have not seriously considered the FI kits because of that, If I spend that kind of money I had better be seeing over 500 rear wheel HP..... which I will find with the N20.... but I would rather have the blower or turbo..
TJ
I have not seriously considered the FI kits because of that, If I spend that kind of money I had better be seeing over 500 rear wheel HP..... which I will find with the N20.... but I would rather have the blower or turbo..
TJ
10-06-2005, 09:49 PM
#24
On The Tree
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would take the truck back to the dealership if I strapped on a supercharger and ran a 15.5. The 15.5 better be at 100mph and I peeled halfway down the track. Nice responses we have going here...keep it up
10-06-2005, 09:53 PM
#25
TECH Resident
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baytown
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the thing to remember is that truck running 15.50's was running 16.50's + before the supercharger.... he did drop over a second off of his times...... I remember the posts about it on DTW but I cannot seem to remember why the truck was so slow to begin with... It would have been nice to see them do it to at least a 14 second truck but ....
TJ
TJ
10-06-2005, 09:58 PM
#26
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: O-G'ville, SC
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have not seriously considered the FI kits because of that, If I spend that kind of money I had better be seeing over 500 rear wheel HP
Just remember - times they are a changin
10-06-2005, 10:00 PM
#28
TECH Resident
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baytown
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColtSteele
TJ-
Just remember - times they are a changin
Just remember - times they are a changin
TJ
10-06-2005, 10:01 PM
#29
On The Tree
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 4x4 diesel would have done a 16.5 stock I bet. Spent a few dollars and knocked a second off of that. It beats quad cab hemis as it sits, ones with exhaust only that is. I always hear the word, Supercharger, and automatically assume its fast. Realistically its fast for a truck.
10-06-2005, 10:03 PM
#30
TECH Resident
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baytown
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
if this makes yall feel any better i seen a silverado ss running 16.17 in the 1/4
Not all are created equal but then that is part of the fun!
TJ