Member Feedback Buyer/Seller references, report frauds here

Public Apology to BlownChevy and Magnuson Products

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #21  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Default

Originally Posted by onyx
.... even though i was the one who tightened em...
Then you better go and check them.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #22  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by onyx
now i feel like going out and checking mine.... even though i was the one who tightened em...
Me too....
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:37 PM
  #23  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

89 inch pounds
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #24  
greentahoe's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Default

That is very cool of you. Im glad you got some of it figured out. I know how frustrating it can be when you feel "taken". Im also very skeptical of anyone that mentions anything to me about purchasing anything from them.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #25  
unklej's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

89 in-lb = 7.4 ft-lbs... thats got to be wrong...

But, I don't have one, it just seems really low

Jeff
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #26  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
89 in-lb = 7.4 ft-lbs... thats got to be wrong
you'd be surprised how many passes are required to get an even 89inlbs.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #27  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
89 in-lb = 7.4 ft-lbs... thats got to be wrong...

But, I don't have one, it just seems really low

Jeff
That is correct.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #28  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
you'd be surprised how many passes are required to get an even 89inlbs.

Thats the truth!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #29  
onyx's Avatar
14 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
Then you better go and check them.

maybe i will... GOD! [/napoleon dynamite]
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #30  
unklej's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Wow, Sorry to question you. It just seemed odd since I'm used to working on Mustangs and the intake torque requirement is 23-25 ft-lb.

Jeff
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.