INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Wisdom Needed (Top end replacement NNBS)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 10:20 PM
  #31  
DOA's Avatar
DOA
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Lakeville,MN
Default

Thanks for all the input guys. I have narrowed my search for heads to the follow used options.

TEA Stage 2 241 5.7L heads Unmilled
WCCH-Edelbrock 200cc 4.8l/5.3l Milled to 52cc chamber

I think the choice is somewhat obvious, except that the WCCHs have a much smaller chamber. I think with a .058 thick gasket I'm about 11.2:1. I thought I saw a gasket that big. Can anyone confirm that?

Is there any other way to lower compression? I'm ok with the 11ish number until a go FI. But when that happens, I need a game plan to lower or I have to ditch these heads....

I can get both of these heads for about the same price within my budget. (1200)

Thanks guys,

Lance

Last edited by DOA; Jan 10, 2010 at 11:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #32  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

I would not go that high on the compression. You are going to have issues with detonation in that very heavy avalanche, I guarantee you. Also, I would stick to GM MLS gaskets. They are much more forgiving in the surface requirement of the block and cylinder head deck.

Also, where are you getting those TEA heads from? The 241 stuff is all outdated and I doubt that it would even be better than a stock 243 head. I asked Richard (WCCH) about the 241 heads and he told me he ditched the CNC program on them like 4 years ago.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 11:19 PM
  #33  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
I would not go that high on the compression. You are going to have issues with detonation in that very heavy avalanche, I guarantee you. Also, I would stick to GM MLS gaskets. They are much more forgiving in the surface requirement of the block and cylinder head deck.

Also, where are you getting those TEA heads from? The 241 stuff is all outdated and I doubt that it would even be better than a stock 243 head. I asked Richard (WCCH) about the 241 heads and he told me he ditched the CNC program on them like 4 years ago.
Agreed, only way you'd need that high of static compression is if your camshaft was designed with a high amount of overlap, that would leave you with too low of dynamic compression ratio and you'd need a high static compression ratio to make up for it. You go to far on the compression, you will be looking at real lazy ignition timing to keep it from detonating, then the thing won't be fun to drive at all.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZONES89RS
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
21
Sep 24, 2015 05:58 PM
Ketis
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
6
Jul 23, 2015 12:37 PM
Aboss
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
Jul 9, 2015 10:28 AM
cwylie
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
4
Jul 7, 2015 11:42 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.