INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

What is considered to big of a cam for 5.3L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2013, 10:50 AM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

With a 5.3, you don't have enough torque to begin with to be able to afford to lose any. Been there, done that...sold the truck.

TSP 220R @ 112 LSA / .581" - Warm Idle - 5.3L - NNBS - Silverado - YouTube
220R on a 112 still has a noticeable idle. We could always split the duration a bit for a little more chop if that's what you really want.

- Beau @ TSP
Old 10-09-2013, 11:23 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
99s10sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Caney Tx
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 69Camaro427
I really want the 228/228 on 112lsa sounds amazing in the 5.3L, but I know bigger is not better for small cubes. Man are there a lot of proven set ups with the 220/220 yall were not kidding. The 228 makes like 10 more hp than the 220 right?

I am liking the 3K stall y'all suggested, I can live with 2,000 rpms to get to 30-45mph.

Being that I have a light 2wd single cab I could afford to lose a little low end tq. Thinking about milling the heads 0.03 and throwing some 0.04 cosmetic gaskets on the truck bump compression to 10.3:1. Would a .8 compression jump help retain some low end?
I have the 228r currently in my ride you will lose bottom end but gain a lot up top. I don't have other cams to compare it to as this my first but im thinking I should have gone smaller. Its just a turd off the line with a 3000 stall but nothing a little nitrous wont take care of.
Old 10-09-2013, 04:46 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Whitecrewcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine is 218/224@.050 but on a 110LSA, it really doesn't hit the powerband hard till about 3600. Widening the LSA out to 112 would help the down low, just not make quite as much peak power. The more compression you can get away with, the less loss of low end you will have. It will squeeze what air makes it in harder so not near as big if a loss.
Old 10-09-2013, 06:29 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
69Camaro427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That 220 sounds pretty F***** awesome too haha

I like a smooth powerful chop not a rattle can ping and ting. Your web site says that cam's power band is from 1200-6200 what rpms does the tq shift to on a stock heads, bolton set up from your experiences?

What effects does different Lsa have. The lower the # more midrange, the higher more topend-low end but lacking in midrange?

Thanks for the help guys really appreciate it by the way
Old 10-09-2013, 06:31 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
69Camaro427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

99s10sb and whitecrewcab yall just talked me out of the 228 and 224 lol
Old 10-09-2013, 07:15 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Whitecrewcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

06 Silverado with a custom cam - YouTube

Here's mine.
Old 10-09-2013, 07:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Whitecrewcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The tighter the LSA, lower number, the more midrange and peak numbers, but it closes up the rpm range. The lower the LSA, the more it chops at idle too. The wider the LSA, spreads the powerband out but with lower peak numbers and settles the idle down.
Old 10-09-2013, 09:37 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
chevyboy.520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 934
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have a isky 224/227 112 lsa that I would trade you for that triple 12 cam
Old 10-10-2013, 09:39 AM
  #19  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 69Camaro427
That 220 sounds pretty F***** awesome too haha

I like a smooth powerful chop not a rattle can ping and ting. Your web site says that cam's power band is from 1200-6200 what rpms does the tq shift to on a stock heads, bolton set up from your experiences?

What effects does different Lsa have. The lower the # more midrange, the higher more topend-low end but lacking in midrange?

Thanks for the help guys really appreciate it by the way
A tighter LSA (111) will narrow the powerband, increase low end torque and give more chop at idle. Wider LSAs (115) give a broader powerband, move torque up in the RPM range and give a smoother idle. Now, obviously more goes into powerband and idle quality than just the LSA. Also, LSA does more than just these two things. Here is a nice reference chart from Comp about cam timing and LSA. Technical Specs & Information

- Beau @ TSP
Old 06-11-2018, 04:18 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Jort27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dirt track racer 81
Tuning is a major key when running low stall with a big cam. I ran a 244/248 cam with a stock 60e converter for almost 2 years I had no drive ability issues at all
did you have any problems with braking? I have a 230/238 cam and my brakes have no pressure


Quick Reply: What is considered to big of a cam for 5.3L?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.