INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Thinking about porting a set of 862s Input Please!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 01:52 PM
  #1  
Camin00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Default Thinking about porting a set of 862s Input Please!!!

Getting ready to do a cam swap 210/218 .584/.584 <"with 1.8 ratio rockers" on 116Lsa

Most important ???
First question will I lose low end tq or tq in general with DIY ported heads?

Thinking of taking off Rocker stud lump, swirl ramp, a lil bit off valve guides, getting rid of the hump from the end of the intake runner into the valve guide area

I also plan on porting the exhaust ports to match the size of the headers.

I plan on polishing the everything with 120 grit to leave a slight rough surface.

I know it is better to take less off than too much!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 04:56 PM
  #2  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

You can go as smooth as you want on the exhaust ports...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 06:04 PM
  #3  
mcfarlnd's Avatar
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 10
From: DFW
Default

Do a before and after to see what you gain. Dyno with the stock heads and then Dyno with your ported heads. I was doing the same thing and ended up saying screw it and bought a new set of WCCH heads.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 06:50 PM
  #4  
Camin00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Beatdown Z
You can go as smooth as you want on the exhaust ports...
That makes sense since the motor is trying to get rid of it anyway.
how rough/smooth on the intake ports would you go?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 07:06 PM
  #5  
Camin00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mcfarlnd
Do a before and after to see what you gain. Dyno with the stock heads and then Dyno with your ported heads. I was doing the same thing and ended up saying screw it and bought a new set of WCCH heads.
Good idea! I have pro comp headstuds that I can reuse with the ported head swap. so I would just have to pay for new head gaskets and porting bits.

I will probably spend the money and get them milled some as well as flow tested if it is not to expensive. I dont plan on porting any "walls" except for the exhaust ones and taking out some factory air blocks within the heads.

It's going to be a $200-400 experiment I guess
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #6  
trevorh1's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

i just port matched a set of 862 i had laying around, i did the intake to match the gasket didnt do to much grinding in the intake runner. just made ports big enough to make air flow smooth because the gasket port is bigger than the port in the head. i also did the same thing on the exhaust but i polished them up pretty good. im puting them on this weekend beacuse my 706 are cracked around the center bolt holes(found a gm tsb on this) im using about a gallon of coolant a week. im also putting in a small trick flow cam. (216/220 .560/.560 114lsa) and the rocker arm trunnion upgrade and springs. so i guess i wont know how good just the heads will do but it has to be better than stock.

Last edited by trevorh1; Dec 6, 2012 at 10:12 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 11:41 PM
  #7  
Camin00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by trevorh1
i just port matched a set of 862 i had laying around, i did the intake to match the gasket didnt do to much grinding in the intake runner. just made ports big enough to make air flow smooth because the gasket port is bigger than the port in the head. i also did the same thing on the exhaust but i polished them up pretty good. im puting them on this weekend beacuse my 706 are cracked around the center bolt holes(found a gm tsb on this) im using about a gallon of coolant a week. im also putting in a small trick flow cam. (216/220 .560/.560 114lsa) and the rocker arm trunnion upgrade and springs. so i guess i wont know how good just the heads will do but it has to be better than stock.
I'm concerned if increasing the velocity of air flow in the heads for a small 5.3L bore is going to cause a loss in low end tq due to the motor is going to get higher in the power band for more airflow in order to match the tq its making with the stock velocity. Obviously we are going gain top end from porting, just cant find much explaining about the low end affects
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 08:02 AM
  #8  
trevorh1's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

yea i know what you mean you want to keep all the grunt you can. i didnt hog the exhausts ports out really at all just made the ports match and polished up the runners a little bit. i didnt want to get to carried away because i stilll wanted all of them to be somewhat equal since i dont just have a flow bench in my back pocket or anything
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 08:24 AM
  #9  
Camin00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Default

Our trucks are so heavy tq is the only reason why they are fast for around town driving. stop light stop light races. I feel like porting them would make the 4000-6000rpms scream 35-50mph but might make the truck a dog from 1000-3000rpms 0-35mph
Did you leave the swirl ramp and rocker stump?

I kinda get a feeling GM put the swirl ramp in for a reason haha but at the same time it seems like it is creating turbulence
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 08:29 AM
  #10  
Camin00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Default

I have also been reading valve angle jobs help out low lift/low tq
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.