INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

TBSS intake vs stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #11  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

dyno's dont mean nothing!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #12  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

Are you sure it is not something other than the intake that is restricting power? have you checked everything else?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #13  
MGMC's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

are the truck injectors the same as the tbss?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #14  
hirdlej's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Originally Posted by hirdlej
By the time you convert to the TBSS intake my god you have damn near $800 in everything. You could damn neat put a FAST 90 setup on it
I am going to revoke my statement from earlier - I am going to be upgrading to a TBSS intake as well with my setup. My ported heads are demanding more than the intake can supply. I found a new TBSS intake complete with fuel rails, injectors and TB for $230 shipped. Another $200 or so in a Dr. X harness and I should be able to do this for around $500 or less. Still better than cutting brackets, relocating pulleys, etc. Now, keep in mind some will tell you the 90mm hole bottlenecks down to 78mm, then opens back up into a 90mm opening. Some will say this is restrictive, I think it's intelligent design at work and GM is trying to produce a venturi effect that will enhance torque everywhere but still give you good flow up top. For the price I'm getting it at, if I don't like the setup, I can sell it all for what I'll have stuck into it. If I understand everything correctly the intake is a direct drop on except for one vacuum line and the TB adaptor. I wonder if a TBSS intake cover will work under the hood.......
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #15  
sickREDsierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Mobile, AL
Default

Originally Posted by hirdlej
I am going to revoke my statement from earlier - I am going to be upgrading to a TBSS intake as well with my setup. My ported heads are demanding more than the intake can supply. I found a new TBSS intake complete with fuel rails, injectors and TB for $230 shipped. Another $200 or so in a Dr. X harness and I should be able to do this for around $500 or less. Still better than cutting brackets, relocating pulleys, etc. Now, keep in mind some will tell you the 90mm hole bottlenecks down to 78mm, then opens back up into a 90mm opening. Some will say this is restrictive, I think it's intelligent design at work and GM is trying to produce a venturi effect that will enhance torque everywhere but still give you good flow up top. For the price I'm getting it at, if I don't like the setup, I can sell it all for what I'll have stuck into it. If I understand everything correctly the intake is a direct drop on except for one vacuum line and the TB adaptor. I wonder if a TBSS intake cover will work under the hood.......
i think you and i are in the same boat here man.

my exhaust isnt making my power suffer, neither is yours. the tunes are close enough... i am almost positive it would have to be my stock 4.8 intake.. and your stock intake as well. i dyno'd cutouts open and closed... still wasnt happy with the power levels..
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
hirdlej's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Originally Posted by sickREDsierra
i think you and i are in the same boat here man.

my exhaust isnt making my power suffer, neither is yours. the tunes are close enough... i am almost positive it would have to be my stock 4.8 intake.. and your stock intake as well. i dyno'd cutouts open and closed... still wasnt happy with the power levels..
+1, I agree. Say could you send me a link to your results as well?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #17  
sickREDsierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Mobile, AL
Default

link sent

may we figure this out
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #18  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

I'm just having a hard time believing that your intake is restricting you, especially at only 5200 rpm. There are plenty of accounts of the truck intake pulling well into the 6000's
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #19  
sickREDsierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Mobile, AL
Default

same intake, same dyno, my 4.8 peaked at +6000.... i think around 6200 or so ?

this motor peaked way lower, but has more volume, better flowing heads and a much bigger cam..

i not know?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #20  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

well, I am very interested to see your results! If I had to change I'd go with the ls6 intake myself, simply for the aesthetics!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.