Nasty Camshaft
Jul 20, 2011 | 02:35 PM
#52
it's not only the ecsb vs scsb thing...your also dragging around a 4x4 drivetrain with you that adds more weight.
a 220/220 and put a cheap re-stalled trailblazer converter behind it and it would be a damn stout setup.
a 220/220 and put a cheap re-stalled trailblazer converter behind it and it would be a damn stout setup.
Jul 20, 2011 | 02:35 PM
#53
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Dothan, AL
Jul 20, 2011 | 02:43 PM
#54
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT. can ya see a trend going on here that people are telling, trying to explain to ya?? Your asking about cams that will require a bigger converter then you said you wanted.. Donkey dick cams in a basic bolt on truck do not mean they are going to run good.. Keep a cam in the 218-224 range on a 112lsa or tighter lsa..
Jul 20, 2011 | 02:50 PM
#56
Im a 4x4 and im running a 222/226 596/598 111+2 lsa.. on a 3600 and 4.10s.. honestly I wouldn't go any bigger!.. these trucks r heavy!..I went from a 217/223 549/549 113 on a 3200 converter and didn't gain much on the 1/8.. smaller cams perform much better on these heavy trucks
Jul 20, 2011 | 02:54 PM
#57
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Dothan, AL
WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT. can ya see a trend going on here that people are telling, trying to explain to ya?? Your asking about cams that will require a bigger converter then you said you wanted.. Donkey dick cams in a basic bolt on truck do not mean they are going to run good.. Keep a cam in the 218-224 range on a 112lsa or tighter lsa..
The next size down that bullet recommended was a 220/226 .590/.585 @112 lsa.... Does this one sound a little more appropriate for my weight issue?