Which of my cams will make the most power?
#1
I am looking for the most power on my 408 twin turbo Dodge. The limiting factor will be 91 octane pump gas. The present cam is a 232-232 @ .050 with a 549-549, it is ground on a 110 and installed +4
The cam I am considering is a 224-224 @ .050 with 573-573, gound on a 113 and installed straight up.
Which will make more power being that 91 octane is the limiting factor on cylinder pressure?
The cam I am considering is a 224-224 @ .050 with 573-573, gound on a 113 and installed straight up.
Which will make more power being that 91 octane is the limiting factor on cylinder pressure?
#3
If you order a new cam, get it as close to 0* overlap as you can. the 224/244 you mention is probably pretty close, where the 232/232 probably has quite a bit of overlap (judging from the lsa's). The rule of thumb is intake + exhaust / 4, so the small cam = 448/4 = 112 lsa minimum, while the bigger cam should be 464/4 = 116 lsa minimum.
With that in mind, more LSA = less cylinder pressure, smoother drivability, lower power curve (in rpms), more torque, etc. For a turbo, all of those things are good things.
I personally think that the 23x range is pretty ideal for turbos on larger cubes. I'll be running my 236/230 in the new 427.
With that in mind, more LSA = less cylinder pressure, smoother drivability, lower power curve (in rpms), more torque, etc. For a turbo, all of those things are good things.
I personally think that the 23x range is pretty ideal for turbos on larger cubes. I'll be running my 236/230 in the new 427.
#4
If I understand things correctly, the cylinder pressure/compression reached is what determines the limit on 91 octane. With the turbos it is easy to add/subtract boost in order to reach the max point. With that in mind does a larger duration and lift cam make any more power than a smaller one, or does the max cylinder pressure/compression point once reached with both cams produce the same amount of power?
#5
If you order a new cam, get it as close to 0* overlap as you can. the 224/244 you mention is probably pretty close, where the 232/232 probably has quite a bit of overlap (judging from the lsa's). The rule of thumb is intake + exhaust / 4, so the small cam = 448/4 = 112 lsa minimum, while the bigger cam should be 464/4 = 116 lsa minimum.
With that in mind, more LSA = less cylinder pressure, smoother drivability, lower power curve (in rpms), more torque, etc. For a turbo, all of those things are good things.
I personally think that the 23x range is pretty ideal for turbos on larger cubes. I'll be running my 236/230 in the new 427.
With that in mind, more LSA = less cylinder pressure, smoother drivability, lower power curve (in rpms), more torque, etc. For a turbo, all of those things are good things.
I personally think that the 23x range is pretty ideal for turbos on larger cubes. I'll be running my 236/230 in the new 427.
I do agree that with larger cubes, a 23x duration camshaft is in the right starting neighborhood for intake duration.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GrooveCityZ71
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
Aug 31, 2015 12:05 PM




