INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

How much HP gain from .020 mill?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #1  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default How much HP gain from .020 mill?

When I put my LQ4 together I had the stock 317's milled .020" because one of the heads had some scratches on it. Can someone tell me how many cc's it took off of the combustion chambers and how much crank and rwhp that it probably gained me?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 08:19 AM
  #2  
mhotrodscooter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
From: jennings,louisiana
Default

1cc for every .007 milled, HP that you have gain, idk maybe 5 to 15.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

Thanks. Anyone else?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #4  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

I have a friend sayin i gained at least 20 hp... I want to get to the bottom of this, so anyone with some hard proof would be much apprecieated! Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #5  
Phantom's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 50
From: The 405
Default

Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 04:07 PM
  #6  
MPFD's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Phantom
What ^^he^^said!

Was that friend from Great Bend? If you use their math, and corrections, you still wouldn't get 20 hp...

Maybe 5-8...at the flywheel
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #7  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

Originally Posted by MPFD
What ^^he^^said!

Was that friend from Great Bend? If you use their math, and corrections, you still wouldn't get 20 hp...

Maybe 5-8...at the flywheel
Thats exactly what i had calculated. I had figured 6 to 8 hp... Thanks man. If anyone disagrees with this please post up and explain why.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 06:59 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Default

Hey buddy from what we have seen, I would say at least 10-15 fly. These motors love compression. remember people on the ls1's go to the ls6 head which flows in the 255-260 range vs the ls1's 220-225 and is 64cc vs 66cc for the ls1 head and the average gain is around 15-20 rwhp gain. You went from around 71-72cc down to 68-69cc. So ya id say 10-15 fly. Maybe 5-10 at the wheels. And yes I am from Great Bend. We don't know what we are doing. We have slow crappy cars. lol
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 08:28 PM
  #9  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

Originally Posted by jarednut4ever
Hey buddy from what we have seen, I would say at least 10-15 fly. These motors love compression. remember people on the ls1's go to the ls6 head which flows in the 255-260 range vs the ls1's 220-225 and is 64cc vs 66cc for the ls1 head and the average gain is around 15-20 rwhp gain. You went from around 71-72cc down to 68-69cc. So ya id say 10-15 fly. Maybe 5-10 at the wheels. And yes I am from Great Bend. We don't know what we are doing. We have slow crappy cars. lol
I don't agree with you guys not knowing what you're doing at all! You guys have the fastest chit for mods I know of around here!! lol I was not trying to offend you or say that you were lying in any way, I was just trying to get some other opinions and try to get some cold hard facts with proof to back it up, but no one seems to have any...

I wish I could remember which HOTROD magazine it was that I read it in, but they tested how much HP was gained from compression. They increased the compression exactly 1 point, like from 10.0 to 11.0 and gained exactly 16 crank HP... BUT, I don't remember what kind of motor it was on. Probably an old school SBC. But results could be completely different on an LS. Thats what I wanted to find out, if it is the same on an LSx based motor.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LS1FREEK
I don't agree with you guys not knowing what you're doing at all! You guys have the fastest chit for mods I know of around here!! lol I was not trying to offend you or say that you were lying in any way, I was just trying to get some other opinions and try to get some cold hard facts with proof to back it up, but no one seems to have any...

I wish I could remember which HOTROD magazine it was that I read it in, but they tested how much HP was gained from compression. They increased the compression exactly 1 point, like from 10.0 to 11.0 and gained exactly 16 crank HP... BUT, I don't remember what kind of motor it was on. Probably an old school SBC. But results could be completely different on an LS. Thats what I wanted to find out, if it is the same on an LSx based motor.

Also remember that the only difference from the lq4 to lq9 is compression and they dyno around 8-12 more at the wheels. That is a half point of compression. They have 10 and the lq4 is 9.5. You should be around 9.8 give or take for what gaskets you used. My 2004 Escalade Had the same tune as my Lq4 engine. same timing, same P.E. Same wideband tuning 12.8 AFR. Everything was the same on the same day and My injector duty cycle on my escalde was 4-5% higher.. That shows that the lq9 has more power the my lq4 did. And the only difference is the half point of compression. And by your track numbers compaired to My old lq4 and Chrises notch which is a stock lq4 you are laying down like 6-10 rwhp over us. All else is the same. Hope this helps. See you soon

Last edited by jarednut4ever; Oct 4, 2010 at 08:46 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.