INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Considering 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2012, 08:39 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
78T/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Considering 5.3

hey everyone

Im considering putting a 5.3 in 78T/a as they are alot cheaper then the car based LSx, and want to get into the LSx world. I was just wondering what kind of power is possible from a cam,intake in one of these engines. Is 400 crank possible without headwork or is there alot more needed...Just curious, trying to figure what im going to spend for my performance goals with the build...

Thanks
Mike
Old 03-01-2012, 08:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
2000chevysilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Machinegun Valley KS
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its possible heads cam headers and really good tune, I've seen a 70s t/a here in ks with a 5.3
Old 03-01-2012, 08:59 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jrmchevyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 78T/a
hey everyone

Im considering putting a 5.3 in 78T/a as they are alot cheaper then the car based LSx, and want to get into the LSx world. I was just wondering what kind of power is possible from a cam,intake in one of these engines. Is 400 crank possible without headwork or is there alot more needed...Just curious, trying to figure what im going to spend for my performance goals with the build...

Thanks
Mike
400 Flywheel HP is easy to achieve with a 5.3L. Get a good cam, LT headers, Good custom tune and you should already be at it if not a hair away. You could get a TBSS or NNBS intake later on and possibly some head work too.

Btw if you get an 2007 and up 5.3L it will already have the better heads and NNBS intake which is pretty much the exact same thing as the TBSS intake. The 2007 and up 5.3L's have more power than the 99-2006 LM7 5.3 engines.
Old 03-01-2012, 09:24 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
78T/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey thanks for reply

Yah I like the 5.3, my dads 07 has the 5.3 and compared to my 4.8 its quite noticeable. Ive toyed with the idea of doing a 4.8 turbo build which would be cool, but im going to have to run around n/a for a while so id like somethign with decent power n/a. If the money allows, id go through the motor and get some mild head work done, but if anything i'd most likely go with a cam and possibly a car intake ls6 most likely

Thanks
Mike
Old 03-01-2012, 09:55 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
dmelvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rock Port, MO
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 78T/a
Hey thanks for reply

Yah I like the 5.3, my dads 07 has the 5.3 and compared to my 4.8 its quite noticeable. Ive toyed with the idea of doing a 4.8 turbo build which would be cool, but im going to have to run around n/a for a while so id like somethign with decent power n/a. If the money allows, id go through the motor and get some mild head work done, but if anything i'd most likely go with a cam and possibly a car intake ls6 most likely

Thanks
Mike
5.3 with a TSP220 or TR220r, set of 243 heads, milled .015, pistons from a 4.8 and a 91oct tune should put you at close if not a bit over 400 at the crank, and give you pleanty of low end umph.
Old 03-01-2012, 10:14 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
78T/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dmelvin
5.3 with a TSP220 or TR220r, set of 243 heads, milled .015, pistons from a 4.8 and a 91oct tune should put you at close if not a bit over 400 at the crank, and give you pleanty of low end umph.
What are the 243 heads off of....milling will increase compression right...I may prefer to leave the heads un milled as I am undecided weither or not im going to go with boost down the road
Old 03-02-2012, 07:43 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
78T/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrmchevyman
400 Flywheel HP is easy to achieve with a 5.3L. Get a good cam, LT headers, Good custom tune and you should already be at it if not a hair away. You could get a TBSS or NNBS intake later on and possibly some head work too.

Btw if you get an 2007 and up 5.3L it will already have the better heads and NNBS intake which is pretty much the exact same thing as the TBSS intake. The 2007 and up 5.3L's have more power than the 99-2006 LM7 5.3 engines.
I may end up running a car intake, Id like to pick up an ls6 intake, but id settle for ls1 also. This will be going into my 78 Trans Am so im going to have to watch the height
Old 03-02-2012, 07:59 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jrmchevyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 78T/a
I may end up running a car intake, Id like to pick up an ls6 intake, but id settle for ls1 also. This will be going into my 78 Trans Am so im going to have to watch the height
Yeah you might get into clearance issues with the taller TBSS intake going in a car. With the right hood it would work though.
Old 03-02-2012, 08:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
TXSZ66AVLANCHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would get a 07 and up 5.3 that already has the flat top pistons and 243 heads.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:13 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
78T/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrmchevyman
Yeah you might get into clearance issues with the taller TBSS intake going in a car. With the right hood it would work though.
Yah and I wouldnt mind the low end torque the truck intakes produce, being my car is relatively heavy...3800ish...the only thing I dont like about the truck intakes is...ugly...I see why GM always covered them lol


Quick Reply: Considering 5.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.