INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

cam/headers on 01' 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default cam/headers on 01' 5.3

getting ready to do a cam/header swap on a buddys 01 sierra with a 5.3. so far we have came up with this set up.

tsp 224XE cam. its a 224 duration and like .566 lift. with 918 springs, 7.4" pushrods and ls2 timing chain.

also going with pacesetter coated long tubes.

i have a few questions

1. Should he keep his stock intake/Tb or upgrade to a LS6 intake and TB?

2. Would we have to make any modifications for the LS6 intake/TB to work if he did go with them?

3. what ratio are the stock rockers on the 5.3? i seem to think they are a 1.5:1. would it be a good idea to upgrade to stock ls1 rockers?

4. looking at going with a 2600rpm stall? any suggestions on brands or anything?

any other suggestions for this would be greatly appreciated. thanks alot.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
southern_chevy's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: Sulphur Springs,Tx
Default

your prolly going to want more stall then that for that cam. As far as intake everyone pretty much sticks with the truck intake. Same thing with rocker arms just re-use the stock ones and they are 1.7:1.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #3  
sonoma43's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
From: Saint Joseph, MI
Default

For the stall I would run the Yank TT3000, stick with the truck intake and stock rocker's as well.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 09:56 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

cool. thanks for the input guys.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #5  
aksz71's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: fort payne ,al
Default

yup like already said.. 3000 or 3200 stall will wake that cam up..
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 05:00 AM
  #6  
dirtychevy99's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Texarkana Texas
Default

i would steer away from a fuddle i am really unhappy with it it is super tight look into circle d my friend bpowell688 swears by them and he put down over 800tq
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #7  
lukesdad04's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sandy Hook, Ky.
Default

I just finished doing the same thing you guys are going to do on my 08 truck. The only exception is I went with the higher lift 224 cam. If you want it to thump at idle get the 112 LSA not the 114. The Yank SSTB 4000 in my truck turned out to be 94% efficient on the dyno, only lost 20hp locked vs unlocked. Pretty efficient for a 4000 stall with a 2.6 STR and the truck runs really good now. My HP and TQ numbers are in my sig. Good luck!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maxspeed05V
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 23, 2015 10:48 AM
nickrench3
New Members
6
Sep 17, 2015 08:48 AM
OVOAustin
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
4
Sep 15, 2015 08:32 PM
11MPG
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
3
Sep 10, 2015 08:34 PM
11MPG
New Members
6
Sep 8, 2015 04:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.