INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

best cam for a 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #11  
SynergyV8's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: In the bar nearest you
Default

Correct. The XER273 is a pretty good 'off-the-shelf' cam for a build such as yours. If your proposed LQ9 is actually getting 60-61cc heads, you're looking at 11-11.2:1 compression so plan to fill up on premium octane only and be sure of your tune.

To take full advantage of the heads and cam, I highly recommend looking into the Trailblazer SS intake manifold, throttle body and a good exhaust. A standard truck intake with stock exhaust manifolds will hold a set of TFS heads back like the Hoover dam.

If it were my truck, I'd have the XER273 custom ground on a 112+2 instead of a 114+2.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #12  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
If I could do it all over again I would get the LQ4 instead of the LQ9. Then put the TSP stage 2.5 5.3s on the LQ4 with something like a 224 or 228 cam. I would guarantee that would get your 400rwhp.
why a lq4 instead of a lq9?
Originally Posted by SynergyV8
Correct. The XER273 is a pretty good 'off-the-shelf' cam for a build such as yours. If your proposed LQ9 is actually getting 60-61cc heads, you're looking at 11-11.2:1 compression so plan to fill up on premium octane only and be sure of your tune.

To take full advantage of the heads and cam, I highly recommend looking into the Trailblazer SS intake manifold, throttle body and a good exhaust. A standard truck intake with stock exhaust manifolds will hold a set of TFS heads back like the Hoover dam.

If it were my truck, I'd have the XER273 custom ground on a 112+2 instead of a 114+2.
yeah i def plan on running only 93 or better
what does the +2 mean adds 2 degrees more advance in the timing i guess
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #13  
SynergyV8's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: In the bar nearest you
Default

Originally Posted by twolow02fransen
why a lq4 instead of a lq9?
More than likely the LQ4 will be cheaper.

yeah i def plan on running only 93 or better
what does the +2 mean adds 2 degrees more advance in the timing i guess
It means the intake lobes are ground 2 degrees ahead of the exhaust lobes. By bringing the lobe separation angle and intake center line down to 112/110 instead of 114/112, you will help increase the cylinder pressure and low end torque of the XER273.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #14  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

do you think i could get the xer273 o a 110 lsa or would it even be worth it
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 04:59 PM
  #15  
SynergyV8's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: In the bar nearest you
Default

Unless you find the off-the-shelf version considerably less expensive, I'd get the custom ground cam made.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

You have better head options with the LQ4 since most everything is geared towards the smaller combustion chambers of the ls1/ls2 heads, assuming you don't want your compression over 11:1. The only real advantage I see with the LQ9 is better quench.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #17  
blackbeast ss's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: LA AND LAS VEGAS
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
You have better head options with the LQ4 since most everything is geared towards the smaller combustion chambers of the ls1/ls2 heads, assuming you don't want your compression over 11:1. The only real advantage I see with the LQ9 is better quench.
quench area = power
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 05:24 PM
  #18  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

well im pretty sure that im going to end up with a LQ9 what is a good price on them ive found a couple for around $1000 up to $2500
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 05:28 PM
  #19  
SynergyV8's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: In the bar nearest you
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
The only real advantage I see with the LQ9 is better quench.
Quench distance is measured by finding the piston-to-deck clearance and factoring that into the head gasket thickness when compressed. Quench distance has nothing to do with compression ratio.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #20  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by SynergyV8
Quench distance is measured by finding the piston-to-deck clearance and factoring that into the head gasket thickness when compressed. Quench distance has nothing to do with compression ratio.
flat top - better quench.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.