INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

April Car Craft - WCCH 5.3L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #1  
dhpro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 1
From: SW CT
Default April Car Craft - WCCH 5.3L

Just got the the april 08 CC mag and they get an extra 120+ ponies out of a stock 5.3 changing cam and heads only. Its nothing Richard hasn't already told us all about but add one of the now widely available rebuilt MP112HH's and ull have 400+rwhp on stock bottom end, for about $8g's! They use both WCCH ported stock heads and Richard's Edelbrock heads. Cam alone gets them almost 100hp on the dyno!
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #2  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

which cam?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #3  
dhpro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 1
From: SW CT
Default

Originally Posted by Moddoo
which cam?
Comp Thumpr (says it has no part #) i: 283/227, ex: 303/241 on 109 LSA and comp beehive springs. I think ull do equally well using the GT2-3 - lots of people have it on here. The cam they use pushes the motor up to 6800rpm, so if u intened to keep it ud better put a forged bottom end on. They suggest a 5-10* smaller on the intake side and sacrifice 10-15hp to keep the stock internals safe. R/
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #4  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

I would love to see 100hp from just a Cam swap on a stock motor since the GT2-3 only gets about 30-40hp tops.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
dhpro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 1
From: SW CT
Default

They're only talking about an engine dyno tho...I'd say the heads & cam will get u 100rwhp and another 100rwhp from the blower and ur gonna be 400rwhp IMO. R/
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
hmatiak's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, GA
Default

im making right at 300rwhp now, so i hope that if i bolted on cam, heads, and FI that i'd be over the 500 mark. That makes more sense to me that just 400rwhp
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #7  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
I would love to see 100hp from just a Cam swap on a stock motor since the GT2-3 only gets about 30-40hp tops.
RPM is free horsepower, and when you extend the RPM range HP is going to follow.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by hmatiak
im making right at 300rwhp now, so i hope that if i bolted on cam, heads, and FI that i'd be over the 500 mark. That makes more sense to me that just 400rwhp
There is no way you are at 300rwhp with a bolt on/tune 4.8.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #9  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
There is no way you are at 300rwhp with a bolt on/tune 4.8.


John
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #10  
joshua022's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
From: Douglasville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Mangled03gmc


John
I was waiting on someone to call BS
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.