INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

All bore 401, most cost effective?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 01:56 AM
  #1  
tahoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default All bore 401, most cost effective?

What are you thought on this concept for an all bore 401?

LSX cast iron GMPP block
4,20 custom pistons, copy of stock but obviously larger diameter.
Reuse ALL stock parts such as crank, rods, plus all the bits and pieces.
(If you are looking beyond DD use, replace the rods)

Top it off with a stock set of L92 heads with L92/L76 intake.
The L92 heads should flow well on that big bore I guess.

This would, depending on cam choice, make a very strong DD.
For a tow motor also keep the stock heads for that BB oval port kind of low down Tq.

What´s your opinion on the benefit of an all bore motor,
as well as the cost of doing one compared with a stroker 402/408?

BR//
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #2  
04Denali's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
Default

Rick @ synergy motorsport which is building my 438 is not a fan of stroke at all, I am going 4.175 Bore and a 4.00 stroke.
Mark
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:19 AM
  #3  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Denali
Rick @ synergy motorsport which is building my 438 is not a fan of stroke at all, I am going 4.175 Bore and a 4.00 stroke.
Mark
Rick is not a fan of stroking a Forced Induction engine set-up, but a longer stroke will give some low end torque at the cost of higher rpm's. ASAIK
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
04Denali's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
Rick is not a fan of stroking a Forced Induction engine set-up, but a longer stroke will give some low end torque at the cost of higher rpm's. ASAIK
I stand corrected
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #5  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I agree with him, I wouldn't go over a 4" stroke in a Gen III/IV sb either.

Just curious though, what in your mind is a stock stroke in a LSX block??? I didn't know they came with a stroke # let alone a crank...
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #6  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

this was also put on 'tech...

all bore 401 would be good for high Hp apps... not high Tq... get a stroker if you want stroker power.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 03:23 PM
  #7  
TurboBerserker's Avatar
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 1
Default

Yep, there's something to be said about the torque of "square" motors -- a 4" (or 4.0x") bore x 4" stroke would be a stout tow rig.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Avalanche2002
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
7
Nov 30, 2015 07:31 AM
lukn4trbl355
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
7
Oct 21, 2015 11:19 PM
Wolftrk99
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
Oct 2, 2015 08:17 AM
blown02408
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
8
Oct 1, 2015 01:06 AM
sTNT971
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
0
Sep 26, 2015 06:27 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.