INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

5.3 LM4 cam choice? Rod bolts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #1  
Ellis Juan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, al
Default 5.3 LM4 cam choice? Rod bolts?

This has been quite the difficult search. With fbodys its pretty easy. There doesnt seem to be so many variances in configurations. With trucks you have 4.8/5.3/6.0-4X4 and different size trucks and transmissions. So deciphering peoples dyno numbers and track times are quite difficult when comparing them to how they will possibly act in my vehicle. So if you guys dont mind giving me a little help that would be great.

This 5.3 is going in my 1976 corvette with a t56,4.11 gears, 1 3/4long tubes, and 3300curb weight. I had to swap out the truck manifold for the ls6 because of hood clearance so take that into consideration. My goal is 370+ rwhp cam only. I was gonna do roller rockers while I was at it and thought about doing either katech or arp rod bolts for added security. Give me little help in making a selection.
Anyone running the comp cams thumpr as seen here http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...o_results.html
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 09:35 PM
  #2  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

I think the general consensus around here on rod bolts is that it's not a good idea to change them out on a used engine.

Regarding the cam, 370rwhp from just a cam I've never heard of from a 5.3. Given that you're vehicle is so light weight though you can afford to go bigger on the cam. If i recall correctly blue cajun got 340 rwhp from his 5.3 with a tr220, but he's got every bolt on known to man. So maybe if you with a tsp torquer or 233/239 you could get it.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #3  
Ellis Juan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, al
Default

I dont want to get too crazy and kill my driveability shooting for some hp number. Ive seen several guys and their trap speeds/sigs along with that carcraft article and it seems semi attainable. I know the carcraft article with the thumpr cam is flywheel hp but if you took 50-60hp off of the 433fwhp they made, you still have 370-380rwhp. I would think 350rwhp is in my reach. I just need some cam choices that can put me close. By all means correct me if Im wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

I forgot you're using a T56. That alone should read 20rwhp or so higher on the dyno.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #5  
dhpro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 1
From: SW CT
Default

Call Richard @ WCCH ---->
He's done plenty of work with that motor using different heads and cam packages, both FI and NA. I spoke at length with him last week about the 5.3 and what to do to it. Not really any advantage to forging the motor unless u plan to use NoS IMO. I think PARISH ran some good #'s as well with his. The internals on these things OEM are quite strong. R/
PS...I think Kenny Dulcich (?) has some good info as well.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #6  
Ellis Juan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, al
Default

Yeah Ive never really considered doing the internals. Ive just heard about the rod bolts being a weak link. Thought about picking up a set of katech rod bolts for added security, but im not sure. Iv been kinda looking at the tsp 228R and the V.2 . Seems like two good proven cams
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 02:56 AM
  #7  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,601
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

As far as the stock rod bolts go, There safely rated to like 450Hp. some say you can go to 500 Hp. They have also been buzzed upwards of 7000rpm. There have been a few issues as far as people running ARP bolts, So unless your gonna take the rods out and have them checked, I would not disturb them. If you want the extra insurance of better bolts, The Katec rod bolts are a direct bolt in and I personally have not heard of one issue with them...
Of course you Pay $$$ for them... Richard will set you straight On a set of heads. I Just got mine done for my 5.3L I also spoke with him about possibly puting together a motor with the Edelbrock small bore package he has... Looks real promising for a turbo set up I have planed... Esspecially with that new manifold they released...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 07:38 AM
  #8  
Ellis Juan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, al
Default

Thanks for all the responses. I got patrick G to spec out a cam for me. Im not gonna worry with the rod bolts. Heck the rod bolts are almost half of the price of a whole used motor! ha. Worst case I have to get a whole new block Ill keep you guys updated on the power I end up making.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 02:54 PM
  #9  
MPFD's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

I would worry more about rod bolts failing at high rpm levels then any specific horsepower rating. If your not gonna spin it over about 6500, I wouldn't worry about rod bolts.

Last edited by MPFD; Jan 7, 2009 at 05:34 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3Okasai
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
15
Mar 9, 2022 01:07 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
Ammadien
New Members
1
Jul 22, 2015 08:50 PM
EscaTruck
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
Jul 20, 2015 11:42 AM
kdw8888
FORCED INDUCTION
8
Jul 9, 2015 10:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.