INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

243's vs. 317's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
budhayes3's Avatar
Thread Starter
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default 243's vs. 317's

Aren't these heads very similar with different size combustion chambers? I don't see too many guys using the 317's, but I assume that the large combustion chambers are the reason. I have WCCH StageII 317's sitting on the shelf for my LQ9, which will be getting milled between .030-.040 when the time comes.

Here's a look at WCCH's StageII 317's flow data vs. their StageII 243 flow data:

http://www.proheads.com/WCCH%206.0L.html

http://www.proheads.com/WCCH%20LS6.html

The flow numbers are very close with the 317's actually flowing more until the lift gets up around .600, then the LS6's have a definite edge...
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
fastrt's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 1
From: Midlothian, Texas
Default

should be same flow, 72cc vs 65cc stock. 73.5cc would take ~ .040 mill to get to 68cc
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 02:46 PM
  #3  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

what kinda CR are you shooting for?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 02:49 PM
  #4  
budhayes3's Avatar
Thread Starter
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
what kinda CR are you shooting for?
About 10.6:1...Richard said that if I mill my 317's about .036 I should be right at my target cr with the flat topped LQ9.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 02:55 PM
  #5  
Bumpers's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo Ms
Default

I've done some research on them and supposedly the 243 will make more power.. With the same size combustion chamber.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
budhayes3's Avatar
Thread Starter
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Bumpers
I've done some research on them and supposedly the 243 will make more power.. With the same size combustion chamber.
I wonder why, as everything that I've heard says the ports are the same...something's gotta be different, as even WCCH's flow numbers are slightly better for the 243's once you get some healthy lift
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #7  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

I have wondered the same, ive like to get a nice set of 317s from a sponsor and run them without milling them, i bet it will surprise a lot of people, the only work i did on my 317s was milled .030, and i only gained .1 in the quarter and that was with the truck being 100lbs lighter. So what actually made my time drop? Milling the heads to bump up CR or the 100lbs? Im willing to bet it was the weight
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 03:06 PM
  #8  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 17
From: Dallas
Default

i have the ported 317s milled to produce 10.6:1 on my lq9
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 03:08 PM
  #9  
Bumpers's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo Ms
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
I wonder why, as everything that I've heard says the ports are the same...something's gotta be different, as even WCCH's flow numbers are slightly better for the 243's once you get some healthy lift
I read somewhere (can't remember where or if its right) but that the combustion chamber was alittle different design than the 317s.. Supposedly a stock 317 with the same size combustion chamber as a 243 would come up about 20ft lb shorter on torque .. I can't remember where I read this info
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 03:18 PM
  #10  
budhayes3's Avatar
Thread Starter
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Bumpers
I read somewhere (can't remember where or if its right) but that the combustion chamber was alittle different design than the 317s.. Supposedly a stock 317 with the same size combustion chamber as a 243 would come up about 20ft lb shorter on torque .. I can't remember where I read this info
Combustion chamber design makes sense with stock heads, but I wonder how different they could be once they're worked...

Last edited by budhayes3; Mar 1, 2011 at 08:47 PM. Reason: misspelling
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.