2011 Tahoe AFM delete cam
#11
Obviously it's best if you check (you'd need to be able to manually test it in both retard and advanced positions). Usually the duration is more critical than the valve lift because of the effect on the opening of the valves relative to the piston position. But neither the duration or the lift are much of an increase over the stock 5.3L cam, so probably ok with the factory compressed thickness head gasket.
#12
You could use your stock valve springs (the 6.2 trucks don't use special springs) and leave the phaser alone. You already have reliefs in the pistons on your 5.3 and the 6.2 cam won't be moving anymore than the 5.3 cam did lol. The lift and duration change are insignificant.
#15
I got the heads pulled off last night. Lots a carbon buildup on the pistons, started trying to clean it out with carb cleaner. Going to clean heads and swap valve springs today. Then I'll start working on dropping the front diff so I can get the oil pan off to block the pressure relief valve in the oil pan. I'm definitely under the gun since we need to take this vehicle in a long road trip on Thursday. Hopefully the tune is close since the cam will only be a slight change. I have Efilive and a wideband but not much time.
#16
I got the heads pulled off last night. Lots a carbon buildup on the pistons, started trying to clean it out with carb cleaner. Going to clean heads and swap valve springs today. Then I'll start working on dropping the front diff so I can get the oil pan off to block the pressure relief valve in the oil pan. I'm definitely under the gun since we need to take this vehicle in a long road trip on Thursday. Hopefully the tune is close since the cam will only be a slight change. I have Efilive and a wideband but not much time.
Last edited by 68Formula; Jun 29, 2020 at 02:04 PM.
#17
Obviously it's best if you check (you'd need to be able to manually test it in both retard and advanced positions). Usually the duration is more critical than the valve lift because of the effect on the opening of the valves relative to the piston position. But neither the duration or the lift are much of an increase over the stock 5.3L cam, so probably ok with the factory compressed thickness head gasket.
I shoved a borescope to the back of the oil pan to inspect the high pressure oil relief valve. I'll attach pictures in another post. Perhaps someone can advise from the pics if it looks like the oil pressure valve shrowd is installed as directed in the TSB
#19
I'm not sure if there's a way to do it without the tool: https://www.enginelabs.com/news/vide...iston-to-valve. So you probably won't have time now with your schedule.
But if you did, you would just need to verify the PTV of a respective valve worst case depending on if it's advanced or retarded (not both valves both advanced and retarded).
But if you did, you would just need to verify the PTV of a respective valve worst case depending on if it's advanced or retarded (not both valves both advanced and retarded).
- Advancing decreases intake PTV clearance
- Retarding decreases exhaust PTV clearance
#20
Update:
It's been a while since I last posted. I completed the cam swap but decided to not take it on the long trip because the fuel trims were too far out. I had LTFTs running about -8 at light throttle conditions. Working on getting my calc_pids file correct so I can start tuning VE. Seems to run and drive like stock, i've only driven it at light throttle so far.
It's been a while since I last posted. I completed the cam swap but decided to not take it on the long trip because the fuel trims were too far out. I had LTFTs running about -8 at light throttle conditions. Working on getting my calc_pids file correct so I can start tuning VE. Seems to run and drive like stock, i've only driven it at light throttle so far.






