Notices
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion 2014+ Trucks | General Discussion

Gears and MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2015, 11:21 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Noah Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Gears and MPG

so now that lockers are hitting the market I'm going to be picking up one for my truck and I think I want to change gear ratios also while I'm at it...

I've heard of people going to 3.90 and 4.10s with the 6L80E and actually not hurting MPG...

If that's true I'd love to go to at least a 3.90 gear (have 3.42 now) what do you guys think, does the 6spd not lose as much mpg as the 4L60E did with a lower rear gear?
Old 07-10-2015, 07:25 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
bigsapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 797
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In for responses. What tire are you running now? I'm 3.5" shorter than factory and that was a bump of about 250 rpm @ 70mph
Old 07-10-2015, 07:59 AM
  #3  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

I feel like this may hold water, mine seems to like to get better economy at 80 then 70, I think 3.73 or 3.90 would be good in mine vs the 3.42.

I forget the OD ratios.
Old 07-10-2015, 12:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Noah Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Mine seems to be the same, 60-65 not so good, 70+ much better
Old 07-10-2015, 01:10 PM
  #5  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

4L60e - .70-1
6L80E - .67-1

Pretty close
Old 07-10-2015, 01:58 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
bk_cauley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Thomasville, ga
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine with 33" mud terrains does better around 60-65 than 50-55 also. 3.42 rear end as well.
Old 07-10-2015, 03:14 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Not apples to apples but my 99 with 3.90s and .7 od got every bit as good as with the 3.42s and was WAY quicker. My 14 averaged exactly 20mpg driving 80-85 from Austin. It got exactly 21 going to Austin driving 75-80. Slower than 70-75 doesn't do as good. I think gears would be a good move.
Old 07-10-2015, 10:43 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
gamble686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Swapping 3.42s to 3.90s my 2000 picked up fuel mileage in every area. Keeping in mind that I have a 60e and 31.9" tires.
Old 07-19-2015, 07:33 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Noah Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

well it appears that 3.90s aren't an option 3.73 and 4.10 is all I've been able to find... what do you guys think, all around best bang for the buck (same price lol) best performance gain vs. least mileage drop (or possible gain)
Old 10-04-2015, 10:20 AM
  #10  
Teching In
 
weazleburger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: louisiana
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm wanting 3.90 as well but may just go with 4.10. Which brand gears and locker are you looking into?


Quick Reply: Gears and MPG



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.