GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion 2014+ Trucks | General Discussion

Gears and MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2015 | 11:21 PM
  #1  
Noah Burns's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default Gears and MPG

so now that lockers are hitting the market I'm going to be picking up one for my truck and I think I want to change gear ratios also while I'm at it...

I've heard of people going to 3.90 and 4.10s with the 6L80E and actually not hurting MPG...

If that's true I'd love to go to at least a 3.90 gear (have 3.42 now) what do you guys think, does the 6spd not lose as much mpg as the 4L60E did with a lower rear gear?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 07:25 AM
  #2  
bigsapper's Avatar
TECH Resident
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 797
Likes: 1
From: TX
Default

In for responses. What tire are you running now? I'm 3.5" shorter than factory and that was a bump of about 250 rpm @ 70mph
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 07:59 AM
  #3  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

I feel like this may hold water, mine seems to like to get better economy at 80 then 70, I think 3.73 or 3.90 would be good in mine vs the 3.42.

I forget the OD ratios.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 12:29 PM
  #4  
Noah Burns's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Mine seems to be the same, 60-65 not so good, 70+ much better
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:10 PM
  #5  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

4L60e - .70-1
6L80E - .67-1

Pretty close
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:58 PM
  #6  
bk_cauley's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Thomasville, ga
Default

Mine with 33" mud terrains does better around 60-65 than 50-55 also. 3.42 rear end as well.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #7  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Default

Not apples to apples but my 99 with 3.90s and .7 od got every bit as good as with the 3.42s and was WAY quicker. My 14 averaged exactly 20mpg driving 80-85 from Austin. It got exactly 21 going to Austin driving 75-80. Slower than 70-75 doesn't do as good. I think gears would be a good move.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
gamble686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Default

Swapping 3.42s to 3.90s my 2000 picked up fuel mileage in every area. Keeping in mind that I have a 60e and 31.9" tires.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 07:33 PM
  #9  
Noah Burns's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

well it appears that 3.90s aren't an option 3.73 and 4.10 is all I've been able to find... what do you guys think, all around best bang for the buck (same price lol) best performance gain vs. least mileage drop (or possible gain)
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 10:20 AM
  #10  
weazleburger's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: louisiana
Default

I'm wanting 3.90 as well but may just go with 4.10. Which brand gears and locker are you looking into?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 AM.