GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion
View Poll Results: What mod would you chose for reliability?
Aftermarket CAM
7
53.85%
Supercharger (TVS, Whipple, or Kenne Bell)
6
46.15%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

What mod would you chose for reliability?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #1  
markislive78's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Default What mod would you chose for reliability?

Ok, let’s say it would take either a CAM or a blower to get my truck in the 12’s. If you had to pick one based strictly on reliability for a "tow vehicle/daily driver" which would you chose? I plan to keep the transmission stock but tuned with HP Tuners… this assumes both are tuned and installed properly with the addition of LT headers...Thanks!

Factor in tranny life also...will a properly tuned "stock" 6L80 last longer with a CAM or a blower @ 6-8psi?

Last edited by markislive78; Feb 4, 2010 at 01:52 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 12:38 PM
  #2  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Blower. TVS.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:30 PM
  #3  
markislive78's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Default

Originally Posted by thunder550
Blower. TVS.
Have you heard more nightmares from CAM'ed only trucks vs blown only trucks?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #4  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

With boost, you can keep the RPMs lower than a cammed setup with less strain on the valvetrain. You can take a stock truck, throw on a blower and a tune and have tons of power with great reliability.

Now take that with a grain of salt, because you can't have power AND reliability forever, there has to be some sort of trade off. But IMO, a mild boosted setup would provide the power gains you want with the best reliability and streetability.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #5  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by thunder550
Blower. TVS.
x2......
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
markislive78's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
With boost, you can keep the RPMs lower than a cammed setup with less strain on the valvetrain. You can take a stock truck, throw on a blower and a tune and have tons of power with great reliability.

Now take that with a grain of salt, because you can't have power AND reliability forever, there has to be some sort of trade off. But IMO, a mild boosted setup would provide the power gains you want with the best reliability and streetability.
Thanks for the reply...

Let's factor in tranny life also...will a properly tuned "stock" 6L80 last with a blower @ 6-8psi?

I hear CAM'ed 6.2's are doing fine ok on stock 6L80's, but that's only 70hp more rwHP...

Last edited by markislive78; Feb 4, 2010 at 01:46 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:44 PM
  #7  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by markislive78
Thanks for the reply...

Let's factor in tranny life also...will a properly tuned "stock" 6L80 last with a blower @ 6-8psi?
I think it would last longer because again, you won't be spinning the kind of RPMs you would with a big cam. Shifting out at 6500+ rpm is really hard on a tranny.

Either way you look at it, they're both going to be hard on the tranny. Thats just a given.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 02:07 PM
  #8  
lownslo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Jxn, Miss
Default

True but you wouldn't get the performance from a cam without a good converter and then you need a trans cooler and the list goes on from there. I would get a good trans cooler and throw on a blower and you can drive normal and never know the difference untill you hit it!

as said before only time will tell on your parts if you add power without upgrading parts, ask me how i know!
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #9  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

I didn't vote.

They aren't comparable.
Blower will add torque, cam won't.
For towing, DD and fun the blower will do what you want.
A cam alone will not.
A cam chosen to work with the blower will work better than the blower only.
A cam will not cause your tranny to explode as quickly as adding 120 foot/lbs.

Screw it, do both!
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 02:28 PM
  #10  
markislive78's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Default

Originally Posted by lownslo06
True but you wouldn't get the performance from a cam without a good converter


There is a guy on the HPTuners boards running 12.4's in an 08' AWD Yukon Denali, just bolt on's and a CAM (stock converter). A good bit heavier than I am... I was hoping the new VVT CAM's help to rid the need of a stall...

Thanks for everyone's input!

It sounds like the tranny would last longer with just a CAM, so what would be more likely to blow up my motor? CAM add or S/C add (6-8psi)?

Last edited by markislive78; Feb 4, 2010 at 02:43 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.