Forced Induction intake options???
#11
Ok so the stock L92 intake is good for 1500hp but I'm down 2 and I know it's all in the tune but many have pointed out the intake and I was pushing the stock block but I would like to know of something better than the stock intake just for insurance would like to be 650 to 700rwhp untill I get a good tranny I'd like to see 750 800rwhp chit or more lol but I'd call it at 775rwhp I think
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The obvious question is what kind of failure did your engines have.
You must know what happened to the first one,
do know yet what happened to the recent one?
If they are 5 or 7 piston failures, you need a new tuner or there may some merit to the
theories on boost and stock intakes.
imho
You must know what happened to the first one,
do know yet what happened to the recent one?
If they are 5 or 7 piston failures, you need a new tuner or there may some merit to the
theories on boost and stock intakes.
imho
#13
The obvious question is what kind of failure did your engines have.
You must know what happened to the first one,
do know yet what happened to the recent one?
If they are 5 or 7 piston failures, you need a new tuner or there may some merit to the
theories on boost and stock intakes.
imho
You must know what happened to the first one,
do know yet what happened to the recent one?
If they are 5 or 7 piston failures, you need a new tuner or there may some merit to the
theories on boost and stock intakes.
imho
#15
X2
Unless you're just set on spending money, I really don't see the 5/7 cylinder problems being an issue. If you did want to swap it out, I'd go with a FAST, though. I know fitment issues have been a big complaint, but that'd be my only option, because the whole 90 degree elbow/sheetmetal deal is not exactly ideal for low-end. Most cars (and trucks, if you run into them), turn serious rpm's that run those setups.
Unless you're just set on spending money, I really don't see the 5/7 cylinder problems being an issue. If you did want to swap it out, I'd go with a FAST, though. I know fitment issues have been a big complaint, but that'd be my only option, because the whole 90 degree elbow/sheetmetal deal is not exactly ideal for low-end. Most cars (and trucks, if you run into them), turn serious rpm's that run those setups.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raggedz71
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
3
07-29-2016 10:20 AM
slowlsx
GM Parts Classifieds
1
08-13-2015 08:28 PM