GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

6.2 hwy MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 09:07 AM
  #21  
raptor700rnut's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Ellis, KS
Default

The best I have ever got out of mine was 22.7 and that was with my drag quad in the back. It gets 19-20 very consistently on the highway at 70-75mph. I have really no proof of this, but it seems to get better when I have a quad in the bed, so I wonder if bed cover would yield the same results? On a day with no wind pulling my 6x12 v-nose trailer with 2 quads in it and one quad in the bed I get 14. But, in Kansas, a day with no wind isn't very common. My truck only see's 91 octane.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 09:36 AM
  #22  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

Oh yeah, I forgot, I use premium only. I promise you that 87 will get worse mpg. I also have a tonneau cover and a front leveling kit.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #23  
ak2007r6's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Default

I noticed the sweet spot for my truck was between 60-65mph. If I started going over 70 it starts to drop. This is running 90 octane...highest we can get from a pump up here
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:20 AM
  #24  
Area47's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: K.C.
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlack98Z
He does all his own tuning, I bet he has 20+hrs on tuning his truck alone =P. As you can tell i'm jealous.
more than that!

Originally Posted by 62nalide
IDK how many hours my tuner had on mine when i got 24mpg but i kept my VVT and i think Area47 did too i might be wrong
that was with the vvt stuff in it. with the ls9 cam. gas mileage sucks.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:10 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Pearland Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Area47
more than that!



that was with the vvt stuff in it. with the ls9 cam. gas mileage sucks.
Lol, was just throwing a ballpark number out there =)
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Katy & College Station, TX
Default

Originally Posted by rjwz28
I average 15 for the tank around town, 14 or 13.x if I play a bit. I don't drive on the highway often enough for credible mpg feedback. I have an Airaid Jr and a tune, CCSB 4x4 with 3.73s on 33-inch Duratracs.
we have almost an identical setup and are getting very similar mpg results. maybe its the leveling kit and 33's that keep us from getting the numbers that others are or maybe we aren't inflating our results.

i recall seeing many threads of area47 getting great results with tuning...maybe you could help me out? ive got an autocal
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 06:07 AM
  #27  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

I'm actually pretty satisfied with my mileage. Last summer, I drove 2300 miles one way without shutting the truck off (even while eating, fueling, rest stops, etc) because it was mid-July and my dogs were with us. The trip average was about 16mpg, and I really wasn't driving for mpgs on that trip.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 08:49 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

I just did a 1200 mile trip with my 3.73 4x4, and couldn't get any better than 18.7 at any speed above 65. Once I hit 75, the mileage dropped into the high 17s. This was with a completely stock tune on 87 and 93. I didn't see a noticeable mileage difference between the two fuels. The only way 87 would hurt you, is if the PCM is pulling timing at cruise, from what it would run with high octane fuel.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 09:24 AM
  #29  
shaw_426hemi's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by MyLS1Hauls
I just did a 1200 mile trip with my 3.73 4x4, and couldn't get any better than 18.7 at any speed above 65. Once I hit 75, the mileage dropped into the high 17s. This was with a completely stock tune on 87 and 93. I didn't see a noticeable mileage difference between the two fuels. The only way 87 would hurt you, is if the PCM is pulling timing at cruise, from what it would run with high octane fuel.
were you running in higher temps or higher humidity? Just curious.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 03:59 PM
  #30  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

It does pull timing on 87; that's why we say it will lose mpg. Did you not read your fuel cap? The recommended fuel is 91+ because it was factory tuned on 91+.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.