GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

wats faster 2000 or 2004??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #1  
beastmode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Import Moderator
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,041
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default wats faster 2000 or 2004??

like the title says im lookin at a 2000 or 2004 rcsb with a 5.3, both prices are right for the years but i have heard from ppl on here that 2000s are faster than 04s just cause of tunes, true or no?? also the 2000 is 4wd and the 04 is 2wd, need you guys $.02, thanks
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #2  
RoosterMcCandles's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Default

The 04 has the advantage since it is 2WD but it would still be close...it isn't like you are comparing a 13 second truck to a 15 second truck...
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #3  
Zick's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default

Yeah I'm with thiems, your not even going to probably notice the difference if you were to drive both of them.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #4  
beastmode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Import Moderator
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,041
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

yea i didnt think having a 4wd would make that much of a difference weight wise dragging me down, i guess it would be better to have the 4wd for when i start modding for the traction though
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
BlackLM7's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

The 2004 would be faster because it's a 2WD and it came with more power from the factory. Don't quote me on this...I think the 2000 5.3 was rated at 285 HP and the 2004 5.3 is rated at 295 HP. I've also seen ALOT of people on this site swapping out their '99-'01 PCM for a '02 and newer PCM. I guess the '02 and newer PCM's have better tuning capability than the older ones.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 03:17 PM
  #6  
Cuerva's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: Palmview Tx. "RGV"
Default

The fastest one from the specific trucks you listed would be the 04 since the 00 is a 4wd. Other than that, if both trucks were 2wd, it would depend on mods and how the trucks respond to them.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #7  
v8
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
Default

stock for stock the 2wd would win, with same mods and same tuning the 2wd would win, if both were 2wd with same mods and same tune then the 04 would win, simple reason as the trucks get newer so do the computers, they also get faster response from the computer.

look at it this way if you bought a computer in 2000 and then one in 2004 the newer computer would work twice as fast lol.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #8  
onebadrubi's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

also for far future mods people are likeing the return system and cable driven TB, to the best of my knowledge.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
From: Spring, TX
Default

If both were 2wd and in stock form, I'm not so sure the newer one would win.
I've driven both, I've owned a 2000 5.3L. The newer trucks are dogs off the line due to excessive TM in the program. The older trucks didn't have much TM in there program.
My brothers 01' Z71 ECSB would out run my 2000 ECSB 2wd silverado. The difference was his comes with 3.73 gears and mine had 3.42's. Mine would try to hang until around 75mph, but after that, his would put many lengths on me.
We even both later placed Hypertech programs in our trucks. The results were pitifull after 100mph. His truck would leave mine a football field behind.
We both had 5.3L engines.
Even with his added weight, it walked my lighter truck.
I'd definately put his up against any newer year truck that had a 5.3L and just a tune. He doesn't even have a CAI kit, just a cosmetic dual exhaust flowmaster muffler with rear exit tips.
I even put a K&N CAI kit, TB spacer, x-pipe, dual magnaflow mufflers with dual side exit tips.
His still out ran me pretty much the same. I couldn't believe it myself.
Oh yeah, he even had 285/75/16 BFG All Terrains KO's. I had 255/70/16 Michelin Cross terrains.
He now has around 120,000mi on it. It still runs just as strong.
The newer PCM's may have faster processors, but the actual o.e.tuning program is holding it back.
So, I don't think a 4wd truck is held back all that much. At least not in this particular situation.

Jim
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 05:39 AM
  #10  
beastmode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Import Moderator
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,041
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

thanks guys
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.