Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

No More LQ9's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2007, 03:08 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
GMC_DUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Western WA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default No More LQ9's

Ordered the 6.0L from Scoggin-Dickey today. Found out GM has discontinued manufacturing the LQ9's, even as crate motors. Had to settle for an LQ4.
Old 07-19-2007, 03:23 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (79)
 
Tootall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 5,175
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GMC_DUDE
Ordered the 6.0L from Scoggin-Dickey today. Found out GM has discontinued manufacturing the LQ9's, even as crate motors. Had to settle for an LQ4.

uhhaaaa . . . . you can order your own pistons else where.
Old 07-19-2007, 03:25 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
ZZebes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

that sucks, order an LS2 and put a truck intake
Old 07-20-2007, 01:01 PM
  #4  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
SGT637's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Temple, Tx
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMC_DUDE
Ordered the 6.0L from Scoggin-Dickey today. Found out GM has discontinued manufacturing the LQ9's, even as crate motors. Had to settle for an LQ4.
That is interesting. The LQ9 crate is listed in the new GM performance parts catalog that just came out. I guess us guys with LQ9 from the factory are stuck out if something goes boom. Buy the Lq4 and put Lq9 piston and rods in I suppose.
Old 07-20-2007, 01:08 PM
  #5  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

SHould have ordered an L92
Old 07-20-2007, 02:14 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
GMC_DUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Western WA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
SHould have ordered an L92
I would but it's a bit pricey, esp. since I also have to buy a new tranny . Plus I wanted something that was a drop-in without having to do much modding, and would work w/ the Radix. Oh well, the LQ4 should be an improvement over the 4.8, and with the Radix and a good tune, prob not much different from the LQ9.
Old 07-20-2007, 04:04 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
KevinF56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wouldnt you rather have an LQ4 for a radix because of the lower compression ratio?
Old 07-21-2007, 11:32 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Red04Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maple Park IL
Posts: 771
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Can you still buy the LQ9 block from SDPC???? I just wanted the block to start my build
Old 07-21-2007, 11:44 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
2002C5COUPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Red04Silverado
Can you still buy the LQ9 block from SDPC???? I just wanted the block to start my build

the blocks are the same as the LQ4's
Old 07-21-2007, 11:50 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
2004SSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KevinF56
wouldnt you rather have an LQ4 for a radix because of the lower compression ratio?

not imo , the 112 cant produce enough boost on a 6.0 to where the compression ratio will hurt performance. if you have goals to go bigger than yes an lq4 would be a better choice.


Quick Reply: No More LQ9's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.