Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Going to look at a few 6.0's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2006, 04:22 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Zick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by white1
3174's flow better, and have larger valves, but I havent figured out yet if the lowere compression and higher flow is better than the less flow higher compression. Ive been trying to find out though.
Well what I plan on doing is getting some LS6 heads from Patriot to raise the compression and keep the added flow, since the LS6 are exactly the same as the 317s but with small cc chambers.
Old 05-02-2006, 04:42 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
onebadrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: arkansas
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So having my 5.3l heads CNC'd and PP and all the other good headwork goodies wouldnt flow as good as the 317's?
Old 05-02-2006, 10:29 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
onebadrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: arkansas
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

found a 6.0l in the classisfieds here with water damange for 650 plus shipping. He said it ran but a littl rough. Could the block be damaged at all? As long as the block is good I think i would be alright for my plans deffinately since im getting such a good deal at 650.
Old 05-03-2006, 09:06 AM
  #24  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
white1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sittin on jackstands
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onebadrubi
So having my 5.3l heads CNC'd and PP and all the other good headwork goodies wouldnt flow as good as the 317's?


No. The combustion chambers on the 5.3 heads are too small for the larger valves with out runing into shrouding problems.
Old 05-03-2006, 12:12 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
onebadrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: arkansas
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok SO head wise the best way to go would have the 317's worked over? Or can I still use the 5.3l heads someway since the higher comp with help N/A
Old 05-03-2006, 01:17 PM
  #26  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
white1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sittin on jackstands
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thats still what Im trying to figure out....Is the extra compression worth the loss of flow, and vice versa? I do know a few people running the 5.3 heads on 6l's though and they seem to be strong.
Old 05-03-2006, 01:44 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
onebadrubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: arkansas
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your really confusing me. You just said I would run into shrouding problems running 5.3l heads on the 6.0? But then said you know of a few people doing it?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GMCtrk
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
18
10-06-2015 03:48 PM
turbo6c3
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
1
10-05-2015 06:11 PM
Cammed4ever
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
09-30-2015 03:38 PM
trevorh1
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
4
09-27-2015 08:47 PM
sTNT971
FORCED INDUCTION
6
09-26-2015 04:22 PM



Quick Reply: Going to look at a few 6.0's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.