GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

GM vs. Microsoft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
Hit Man X's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Default GM vs. Microsoft

MICROSOFT SHOULD MAKE CARS, GM SHOULD MAKE SOFTWARE.

At a recent computer expo, Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated:

"If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments/General Motors issued a press release stating the following: "If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, your car would die on the freeway for no reason, and you would accept this, restart, and drive on.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart; in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought 'Car95' or 'CarNT.' Then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.

7. The oil, water, temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car fault' warning light.

8. New seats would force everyone to have the same butt size.

9. The airbag system would say 'Are you sure?' before going off.

10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need them nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50 per cent or more.

12. Every time GM introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You'd press the 'Start' button to shut off the engine.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
03Screamer's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Talking

OMG that is hilarious! LMAO
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 10:31 PM
  #3  
ThunderZ28's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 1
From: La Porte Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Hit Man X
MICROSOFT SHOULD MAKE CARS, GM SHOULD MAKE SOFTWARE.

At a recent computer expo, Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated:

"If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments/General Motors issued a press release stating the following: "If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, your car would die on the freeway for no reason, and you would accept this, restart, and drive on.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart; in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought 'Car95' or 'CarNT.' Then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.

7. The oil, water, temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car fault' warning light.

8. New seats would force everyone to have the same butt size.

9. The airbag system would say 'Are you sure?' before going off.

10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need them nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50 per cent or more.

12. Every time GM introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You'd press the 'Start' button to shut off the engine.
i think Mr. Bill just got by GM
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 10:38 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
From: Fenton, MI
Default

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart; in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.


LOL! That one cracks me up.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
JSmith's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

Hehe, what makes so damn funny is that those would statements would be true!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #6  
goshawk23's Avatar
Truck addict
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,559
Likes: 0
From: Ocean Springs, MS
Default

Originally Posted by 01 Thunder
i think Mr. Bill just got by GM
true dat
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 12:42 AM
  #7  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

JSmith has a point ... it would all be true.

To top it all off .. everyone would have GM cars and think they were the best damn thing since sliced bread even though they were all ****.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 03:24 AM
  #8  
MacADaYear's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Default

Lol

**** MS
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
O3GMC's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

"Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive"

couldn't be farther from the truth.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 12:32 PM
  #10  
slow4.8's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Kaufman, Tx
Default

what's a computer?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.