GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Fuel mileage fix

Old Oct 15, 2019 | 07:02 PM
  #21  
Project.rado1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
We've already covered this with this guy. Get a new tune or post your tune, otherwise she is going to get 10, and as stated and verified by other posters; its not bad or far off. Really depends on how you drive. Do you ease off of lights, or do you give it 50% throttle until youre at 45mph?

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...r-what-555988/
not sure how to post my tune, and I drive it really easy, ease off lights and try to keep a steady speed, I use cruise when I can as well
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 08:01 PM
  #22  
madmann26's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
There is no way any truck except a street tired, lowered and bolted 2wd RCSB manual 4.8 is getting 20mpg on the highway. I didnt even get that headed downhill from 6000' to sea level when my Tahoe was bone stock on 28" tires and 3.73s

Ppl really do swing MPG numbers around like an e-****
My 370 with 706 heads gets 20mpg at 68-70. It’s repeatable.

I run about 42 degrees timing in my cruising cells.

But, I have a 29.5in tire. Not a 34in.

Stop and go, no way. It’s 10-12. Daily drive back and forth to work I’m at 13.6.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 08:32 PM
  #23  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,518
Likes: 244
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

I get about 12 mpg city in my truck, and 31 mpg highway













in my Integra. My truck just touches 14 mpg highway, 13.9-14.1.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 09:33 PM
  #24  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Default

My 14 with 3.42's averaged 22 @ 75-80 when new and 20 @ 80-85 on way back same trip when new. Now ~ 20 @ ~70 cruise. Mixed is 13.6 long term but I don't nail it all that much. Mostly putt around town loaded to 5800-6000 lbs. Still sucks. Traded my 06 2500 rclb because it averaged 13 loaded to about the same weight. Wish I hadn't because it would've been so much less to mod. My 07 turbo averaged 21 hwy on 32's and 4.10's.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 09:40 PM
  #25  
arthursc2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 1,517
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
My 14 with 3.42's averaged 22 @ 75-80 when new and 20 @ 80-85 on way back same trip when new. Now ~ 20 @ ~70 cruise. Mixed is 13.6 long term but I don't nail it all that much. Mostly putt around town loaded to 5800-6000 lbs. Still sucks. Traded my 06 2500 rclb because it averaged 13 loaded to about the same weight. Wish I hadn't because it would've been so much less to mod. My 07 turbo averaged 21 hwy on 32's and 4.10's.
Apples to oranges Mr DI and badass heads lol
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2019 | 01:49 AM
  #26  
adriver's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 247
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
There is no way any truck except a street tired, lowered and bolted 2wd RCSB manual 4.8 is getting 20mpg on the highway. I didnt even get that headed downhill from 6000' to sea level when my Tahoe was bone stock on 28" tires and 3.73s

Ppl really do swing MPG numbers around like an e-****
I have a 2002 reg cab with a 4.8, 5spd, 244K miles, and I rev near max every chance I get. I get about 15 mix and gets 21 mpg road trip highway, 22 when I had a tonneau cover on it. That's going 75-80 with CC on.




Even a SRT10 gets 12mpg. OP got it doing that low mileage, and the previous owner probably got rid of it because of it. I swear I read this thread before, and this thread is only a day old..... I see it. https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...r-what-555988/


OP, just throwin it out there. The 99 is a split year for the pickup, OBS and NBS were made that year. Any chance there is something that's made for the other model?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2019 | 01:51 AM
  #27  
Project.rado1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Not sure. I know it has the 99-2000 intake cover, unless your talking about pcm wise
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2019 | 02:44 AM
  #28  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

If truck does a lot of idling, and stop and go driving that is not way off. One thing to check is make sure the knock sensors are not all crudded up and pulling timing, and egr valve is not sticky. I'd unhook or get rid of egr if you dnt have emissions testing. A front end of truck lifted with a Tbar crank can eat up fuel. Also are the tires really wide and heavy? I have a 06 Tahoe 4x4 with 32'' tires, 6,0L with 799 heads and small cam, 4.10 gears. In a small town with lots of red lights I get 11.5~12 mpg. Highway is 16~18 depending on speed, wind, etc. The stock 5.3L and 3.42 gear combo seemed to get a little better mpg in town but on HW the 6.0 and 4.10 combo is a little better. Weird how that works.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2019 | 02:57 AM
  #29  
adriver's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 247
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Project.rado1500
Not sure. I know it has the 99-2000 intake cover, unless your talking about pcm wise
I can't really come up with something specific. If you got it that way, just thinking maybe the previous owner did some repairs and used the wrong parts for something. Do you have any previous owner history or receipts you might be able to double check part numbers?

Seems to me like most people in this thread are missing the part where OP said they were getting 10mpg when they got it and it was bone stock. The mods decreased about what the tune would increase.

Ummmm You're not driving this thing around all the time in 4wd are ya?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2019 | 08:06 AM
  #30  
Project.rado1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by adriver
I can't really come up with something specific. If you got it that way, just thinking maybe the previous owner did some repairs and used the wrong parts for something. Do you have any previous owner history or receipts you might be able to double check part numbers?

Seems to me like most people in this thread are missing the part where OP said they were getting 10mpg when they got it and it was bone stock. The mods decreased about what the tune would increase.

Ummmm You're not driving this thing around all the time in 4wd are ya?
I've checked and hubs are unlocked while driving, idk what the previous owner could have done becausecive replaced mostly everything from plugs, fuel filter, air and oil filter, fresh fluid all the way around, no dragging brakes, new o2 sensors, only things I have not changed are injectors really, idk what else to check, faulty tps? Iac? Who knows, but 10mpg for when it was bone stock, and 9mpg after a full tune up with a tune just isnt normal, if you get what I'm sayin, I think it should just get more mileage as it is rather than me needing to dump several hundred dollars into upgrades
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.