GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

do yall think ill win?!?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:15 AM
  #11  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Those older 4.7 tundras are pretty quick even stock, I think he'll beat you.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #12  
Dewey's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

i agree with outlawz
the 5.7 vortec (assuming it's a newer obs) had lots of torque down low but only had somewhere in the neighborhood of 250 horsepower, and that z-71 has a lot of extra weight.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #13  
outlawz2004's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 2
Default

I was beating both those 5.7 chevys and those 4.7 toyota when my truck was stock, and its just a 4.8 ext cab with highway gears.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #14  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

I think it will be a race to see who gets tired of driving first. Attack of the 16 second trucks.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:47 PM
  #15  
gmcswb199's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS: h'vill, smallest, boringest town u could ever dream of
Default

Originally Posted by outlawz2004
I was beating both those 5.7 chevys and those 4.7 toyota when my truck was stock, and its just a 4.8 ext cab with highway gears.
if you were beating the 5.7 and 4.7, stock, and ext cab, then im pertty sure ill win, im single cab, thats atleast 1000lbs weight difference
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #16  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by gmcswb199
thats atleast 1000lbs weight difference
more like 400lbs...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: East of the east bay CA
Default

Your going to lose man... sorry if you got a tune then you would probably win, like scott said the 4.7 tundra's are kinda quick for what they are.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #18  
gmcswb199's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS: h'vill, smallest, boringest town u could ever dream of
Default

Originally Posted by Chris05
Your going to lose man... sorry if you got a tune then you would probably win, like scott said the 4.7 tundra's are kinda quick for what they are.
yea but "outlawz2004" said he could beat both, and he had a 4.8 ext cab, stock!!! and i have a 4.8 single cab?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:32 PM
  #19  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by gmcswb199
yea but "outlawz2004" said he could beat both, and he had a 4.8 ext cab, stock!!! and i have a 4.8 single cab?
his truck is freakishly fast for what it is.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #20  
gmcswb199's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS: h'vill, smallest, boringest town u could ever dream of
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
more like 400lbs...
that dosnt make sence, 400 lbs more on a ext cab than a single cab??? ok its 2 or 3 ft more of frame, pluse 2 or 3 foot more of exhaust pipe, plus to more doors, plus that much more cab, plus the bench seat, windos...ext. its more than 400lbs, it might be less than 1000lbs but 400lbs, no way.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.