Anyone know how to adjust track times for altitude
#1
Thread Starter
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
I was wondering because FL8PONY said because of the heat yesterday, the DA made the conditions equivilant to us running at 3000-3200 feet. I searched for a calculator but couldn't find one, I've seen where guys adjust there times for running at sea level when run at higher altitudes. Just kind of curious to see what the truck may have done if the conditions would have been better. I know it won't be exact but I would just like to see.
Thanks, Jim
Thanks, Jim
#2
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
This page has the correction factors to convert to sea level. You may have to register to see it but, the site is well worth it. 
<a href="http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/nhra_correction_factors.php" target="_blank"><font color="red">Altitude Correction Factors<!--color--></font></a>
John

<a href="http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/nhra_correction_factors.php" target="_blank"><font color="red">Altitude Correction Factors<!--color--></font></a>
John
#3
Thread Starter
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
Thanks, John!
I did the corrections and I don't know if they're true but here's what the times corrected to. Base on the 3000 foot conversion number for ET and speed, this is what the times MAY have been.
Best run: 15.02 @ 91.33 converted to 14.47 @ 94.80 mph
worst run: 15.33 @ 90.49 converted to 14.77 @ 93.94 mph
The 3000 foot conversion was multiply the ET by .964 and the speed by 1.0381 to get the corrected times. I don't know if I believe it or not but I just wanted to see.
Thanks, Jim
I did the corrections and I don't know if they're true but here's what the times corrected to. Base on the 3000 foot conversion number for ET and speed, this is what the times MAY have been.
Best run: 15.02 @ 91.33 converted to 14.47 @ 94.80 mph
worst run: 15.33 @ 90.49 converted to 14.77 @ 93.94 mph
The 3000 foot conversion was multiply the ET by .964 and the speed by 1.0381 to get the corrected times. I don't know if I believe it or not but I just wanted to see.
Thanks, Jim
#4
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
I don't know either how accurate they are but, I've personally picked up over .4 seconds and 4mph from JUST better weather conditions.
I bet they're pretty close.
John
I bet they're pretty close.
John
#5
If you are running a Naturally Aspirated motor you will notice a big differance between weather conditions and elevation.
I noticed on my GTO drag motor on the dyno at peak power it made .5 Psi of boost on a N/A motor. I can imagine that falling off at a higher elevation.
I noticed on my GTO drag motor on the dyno at peak power it made .5 Psi of boost on a N/A motor. I can imagine that falling off at a higher elevation.
#7
Thread Starter
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
who cares? that would be like me correcting my times to figure out what i'd run if i lived in new york where its cooler and less humid
Jim

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
Feb 21, 2022 10:54 AM
Boombastic
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
4
Aug 5, 2015 11:38 AM




