GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

99 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
WICK3DxGATA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: college station, TX
Default 99 5.3

okay so i got a 99 5.3 and i just want to know why people say they are so much worse than all the other years.
i just want to know whats so much different about the engines that they are so much underpowered compared to the rest of the 5.3 year models?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:21 PM
  #2  
WICK3DxGATA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: college station, TX
Default

nobody????
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:26 PM
  #3  
53bowtie's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 14
From: Detroit, MI
Default

Do some searching on here I am sure it has been covered before. IIRC the computer tune is different and the injectors are lower lb/hr.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:53 PM
  #4  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

Only underpowered because of the tune and a slightly smaller cam.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
53bowtie's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 14
From: Detroit, MI
Default

I was thinking the injectors were something like 22 or 24 lb/hr and then in 02 they went to a 26lb/hr injector as well is this accurate or no? I thought I remembered something to that effect because I was researching my 02 awhile back.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #6  
WICK3DxGATA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: college station, TX
Default

okay thanks guys.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 04:49 PM
  #7  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

You're right Thomas, the injectors are smaller. They're around 22 lb/hr at 58 psi vs 24/25 for the later years.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maxspeed05V
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 23, 2015 10:48 AM
nickrench3
New Members
6
Sep 17, 2015 08:48 AM
OVOAustin
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
4
Sep 15, 2015 08:32 PM
11MPG
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
3
Sep 10, 2015 08:34 PM
11MPG
New Members
6
Sep 8, 2015 04:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.