GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

5.57 rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #1  
2000 SILVERADO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default 5.57 rear?

Well i'm bored and was wondering what would happen if I ran this gearing.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #2  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
Default

You would be pretty fast up to about 80, then be just about done.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

30 mph in 4th? No traction? 5 mpg?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Default

Hell 80 I was thinking more like 50, take off would be insane, But you couldnt take it on the highway becasue constant rev. of the motor would cause some serous damage. If I were you Go 3.90 I think that what Im gonna run. Right in the middle of a 3.73 and 4.10.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

you'd have less problems towing. might be good for dirt tracking, but that's about it.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #6  
2000 SILVERADO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by onequick5.3
Hell 80 I was thinking more like 50, take off would be insane, But you couldnt take it on the highway becasue constant rev. of the motor would cause some serous damage. If I were you Go 3.90 I think that what Im gonna run. Right in the middle of a 3.73 and 4.10.
I thought a higher gearing would would be better for top end. So you're saying the 3.42 rear I have now is for top end or more low end?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #7  
Zick's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by 2000 SILVERADO
I thought a higher gearing would would be better for top end. So you're saying the 3.42 rear I have now is for top end or more low end?

Yours is better for Top end.
Higher the number=more low end
Lower the number=more top end
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #8  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

ha you would be tached out around 45
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #9  
CAMMIN03''s Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 1
From: Athens, GA
Default

Get you some 4.10's and then a nice cam.... you should be alright..
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #10  
GMC_DUDE's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Western WA
Default

Max. speed would be as if he had 3.90 gears and no overdrive (5.57 * 0.696 = 3.87672). Using stock tires, he would be turning about 4200 RPM at 70 MPH and his max. speed, assuming a redline of 6000 RPM, would be about 100 MPH, about where the stock PCM tune limits the truck.

Not all that bad IMAAHO.

n.b. that many passenger cars in the 1950's and 60's would turn around 3000 RPM or so at highway speeds. It's only been since the common use of overdrive in the mid 1970's that we've seen the now typical cruising RPM's of 2000 or less.
(for the purists yes I know they had overdrive in the 1950's, but it was an option that most cars did not have)
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.