Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

12-13-12 2014 Silverado unveiled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2012, 02:22 PM
  #61  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
SCOTT_A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lebanon, NH
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert91RS
I have heard this concern before so what do you propose as an alternative? I'm not being condescending, I just mean we ultimately decide the terminology ouselves so what acronym can we all agree on? It needs to be catchy and simple so that everybody adopts it. I use "NNBS" in image, thread or parts seraches all the time because everybody has accepted it as a universal description for the 07.5-2013 trucks. Maybe a generation designation? What Gen is this truck now?
The trucks previous to 1999 (88-98) were not called A Silverado. They were K1500 or C1500. Perhaps the NBS (99-07) could be Gen1 Silverado, 07-13 could be Gen2 and the new one, Gen 3.
Someone needs to come up with something, because NNNNNBS is going to make my head explode.
Old 12-14-2012, 02:31 PM
  #62  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
SCOTT_A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lebanon, NH
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The Corvette has a simple "code" C5, C6 and now the C7 will come soon. How about Silverado, Sierra S1, S2, S3?
Old 12-14-2012, 02:36 PM
  #63  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why not include the previous generations since they are all still C/K trucks. I would consider the generations as follows:
Gen1 1960-1966
Gen2 1967-1972
Gen3 1973-1987
Gen4 1988-1999
Gen5 2000-2007
Gen6 2007.5-2013

So that would make this Gen7 or CK7 if you prefer? If enough people agree, pick a name, and start throwing it around, you will have helped create the new title lol.
Old 12-14-2012, 03:12 PM
  #64  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
nonnieselman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Crystal Springs, MS
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So about these CK7 trucks...... the 4.3 is suppose to be making some good power eh?

Alum block?
Old 12-14-2012, 03:24 PM
  #65  
TECH Fanatic
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: K.C.
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slammed96
As I have stated before, I want to see these things in action! Also, I wonder just how much power the stock ECM is going to allow. If the GEN III/IIV ECM's are anything to go off of, a lot of potential was left out from the factory tune.
they leave power on the table for warranty on longevity reasons. id say on the average of a basic maf/pe/timing tune about 20whp. once you dig into the cam tables and injection timing, different fuels etc etc im sure there would be another 10-15 in it.
Old 12-14-2012, 03:34 PM
  #66  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nonnieselman
So about these CK7 trucks...... the 4.3 is suppose to be making some good power eh?

Alum block?
Yep alum block, 11:1 CR, DI, VVT. Should make for a pretty damn nice base motor. I would like to speculate HP numbers.... so if the 4.3 makes 300, which seems reasonable, can we expect 360ish from the 5.3 and 480 from the 6.2? Not to mention all the torque under the curve thanks to the improved VVT and then whatever they make on E85....

Okay so just for fun here are my HP guess 4.3-325hp, 5.3-400hp, 6.2-475hp. Feel free to throw out your guesses and lets see how we fair.

Last edited by Robert91RS; 12-14-2012 at 03:40 PM.
Old 12-16-2012, 03:39 AM
  #67  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
CashDudeHomie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think it was pretty lazy and stupid for GM to name their new engine "LT1"
Old 12-16-2012, 08:42 AM
  #68  
TECH Resident
 
KozzyJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 814
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert91RS
Yep alum block, 11:1 CR, DI, VVT. Should make for a pretty damn nice base motor. I would like to speculate HP numbers.... so if the 4.3 makes 300, which seems reasonable, can we expect 360ish from the 5.3 and 480 from the 6.2? Not to mention all the torque under the curve thanks to the improved VVT and then whatever they make on E85....

Okay so just for fun here are my HP guess 4.3-325hp, 5.3-400hp, 6.2-475hp. Feel free to throw out your guesses and lets see how we fair.
im gonna say 4.3-300hp, 5.3-370hp "just to say they have more power than the 5.0", and the 6.2-430hp
Old 12-17-2012, 11:13 AM
  #69  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
slpsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lexington, TN
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What do you guys think of the rear bumper steps? Functional...but looks awful, IMO.

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LTZ photo
Old 12-17-2012, 12:09 PM
  #70  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
slammedsilvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lee's Summit, Mo
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What I can tell you is this.... the 4.3liter V6 engine will out perform a stock LS1 in every area possible. Or to say it another way it will drag the STOCK LS1 ***** against the Asphalt. That should give you some type of gaming changing performance we are looking at going forward.


They sure are talking these new engines up quite a bit. I'm anxious to see what they deliver.


Quick Reply: 12-13-12 2014 Silverado unveiled



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.