GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

02 1500HD low power issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2015 | 08:02 AM
  #21  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

Ahh. Yeah i dont plan to pull the valley cover unless i see a problem once i get in.
Reply
Old May 31, 2015 | 09:33 PM
  #22  
2002_Z28_Six_Speed's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 65
From: Wash, DC.
Default

Yup. The insulation on the harness can get brittle due to heat. The connectors on the harness also get weak. The knock sensors themselves -- same issue. If you try to pull the plug off and not be careful the plastic can crack. Valley cover gasket and knock sensor seals probably aren't needed but it is one of those things you think about more when you get closer to joining the 200 000 mile club.

The intake manifold seals ARE a good deal. I have seen plenty of those leak
Reply
Old May 31, 2015 | 09:59 PM
  #23  
Hobbyracer75's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Teague texas
Default

I replaced the MAF, and pcv valve, Cleaned the the throttle body, and sea foamed the intake with half a can, and put other half in the fuel tank. Truck is running better, but still seems sluggish, and the p0101 code came back. What would the next step be?
Knock out the cats? Looks like a super hard job without having a welder.
Any other sensors I should look at?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2015 | 12:19 AM
  #24  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,592
Likes: 900
From: JunkYard
Default

Was it a New MAF or a remanufactured one???
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2015 | 07:10 AM
  #25  
Hobbyracer75's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Teague texas
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
Was it a New MAF or a remanufactured one???
It was new
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2015 | 09:21 AM
  #26  
GMC93's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 236
Likes: 2
From: Lorena,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
the harness is cheap and often corrodes when the sensors rust. it's one of those "better go ahead while I'm in there" parts. if the truck didn't pull timing on the stock tune when the sensors were working correctly, I would just delete the CEL. the s10 runs perfectly fine with no knock sensors. I'm trying to keep the HD as stock as possible though (except for the possible turbo lol)
So was it a big difference in power with a set of working knock sensors?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2015 | 10:30 AM
  #27  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

yes. before it felt like a 4.8 trying to pull a 3/4 ton truck if I stomped it from a dig...it made a hollow noise and slugged out there. now it is a ton more responsive and will actually turn the tires on dry pavement with 33" tires. before the new senosrs/harness it wouldn't turn the tires on a wet road going up hill. I wouldn't be surprised if the MPG improves too.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2015 | 10:41 AM
  #28  
GMC93's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 236
Likes: 2
From: Lorena,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
yes. before it felt like a 4.8 trying to pull a 3/4 ton truck if I stomped it from a dig...it made a hollow noise and slugged out there. now it is a ton more responsive and will actually turn the tires on dry pavement with 33" tires. before the new senosrs/harness it wouldn't turn the tires on a wet road going up hill. I wouldn't be surprised if the MPG improves too.
Good job on getting it fixed
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2015 | 07:51 PM
  #29  
Hobbyracer75's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Teague texas
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
yes. before it felt like a 4.8 trying to pull a 3/4 ton truck if I stomped it from a dig...it made a hollow noise and slugged out there. now it is a ton more responsive and will actually turn the tires on dry pavement with 33" tires. before the new senosrs/harness it wouldn't turn the tires on a wet road going up hill. I wouldn't be surprised if the MPG improves too.
Should I only worry about the knock sensors if I have a code for them? That seems just like what my truck is doing.
For something advertised as 285 tq. I would think it would be able to spin the tires at least in gravel. With no load, it has to shift into third to pull a slight hill, it's actually pretty sad. 15 sec 0-60 time???? Really????
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2015 | 07:58 PM
  #30  
Hobbyracer75's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Teague texas
Default

Also, I had a. 04 Yukon xl with the 5.3. It quit running on my wife wile she was on a trip (400 miles from home) find out the cats were plugs smooth up. They said to replace the manifold gaskets, so I did, but turned out the intake itself had a crack in it. Is that a common problem also, other than the gaskets leaking.
Chevy tech said that the crack "seals up" during idle, but when at WOT the crack opens up and really leans out the motor causing the cats to melt.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.